DeYoung Colin G, Quilty Lena C, Peterson Jordan B
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Nov;93(5):880-96. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880.
Factor analyses of 75 facet scales from 2 major Big Five inventories, in the Eugene-Springfield community sample (N=481), produced a 2-factor solution for the 15 facets in each domain. These findings indicate the existence of 2 distinct (but correlated) aspects within each of the Big Five, representing an intermediate level of personality structure between facets and domains. The authors characterized these factors in detail at the item level by correlating factor scores with the International Personality Item Pool (L. R. Goldberg, 1999). These correlations allowed the construction of a 100-item measure of the 10 factors (the Big Five Aspect Scales [BFAS]), which was validated in a 2nd sample (N=480). Finally, the authors examined the correlations of the 10 factors with scores derived from 10 genetic factors that a previous study identified underlying the shared variance among the Revised NEO Personality Inventory facets (K. L. Jang et al., 2002). The correspondence was strong enough to suggest that the 10 aspects of the Big Five may have distinct biological substrates.
在尤金 - 斯普林菲尔德社区样本（N = 481）中，对来自两大五因素人格量表的75个侧面量表进行因素分析，得出每个领域15个侧面的两因素解决方案。这些发现表明，在大五人格的每个维度中都存在两个不同但相关的方面，代表了侧面和维度之间人格结构的中间水平。作者通过将因素得分与国际人格项目池（L. R. 戈德堡，1999）相关联，在项目层面详细描述了这些因素。这些相关性使得能够构建一个包含10个因素的100个项目的量表（大五人格侧面量表[BFAS]），该量表在第二个样本（N = 480）中得到了验证。最后，作者研究了这10个因素与先前一项研究确定的10个遗传因素得分之间的相关性，这些遗传因素是修订后的NEO人格量表侧面之间共同方差的基础（K. L. 张等人，2002）。这种对应关系足够强，表明大五人格的10个方面可能具有不同的生物学基础。
