Shardell Michelle, Scharfstein Daniel O, Vlahov David, Galai Noya
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland, 660 West Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD 21201-1596, USA.
Stat Med. 2008 Dec 10;27(28):5861-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.3397.
We consider the problem of comparing cumulative incidence functions of non-mortality events in the presence of informative coarsening and the competing risk of death. We extend frequentist-based hypothesis tests previously developed for non-informative coarsening and propose a novel Bayesian method based on comparing a posterior parameter transformation with its expected distribution under the null hypothesis of equal cumulative incidence functions. Both methods use estimates derived by extending previously published estimation procedures to accommodate censoring by death. The data structure and analysis goal are exemplified by the AIDS Link to the Intravenous Experience (ALIVE) study, where researchers are interested in comparing incidence of human immunodeficiency virus seroconversion by risk behavior categories. Coarsening in the forms of interval and right censoring and censoring by death in ALIVE is thought to be informative; thus, we perform a sensitivity analysis by incorporating elicited expert information about the relationship between seroconversion and censoring into the model.
我们考虑在存在信息性截尾和死亡竞争风险的情况下,比较非死亡事件累积发病率函数的问题。我们扩展了先前为非信息性截尾开发的基于频率主义的假设检验,并提出了一种新颖的贝叶斯方法,该方法基于在累积发病率函数相等的原假设下,将后验参数变换与其期望分布进行比较。两种方法都使用通过扩展先前发表的估计程序得出的估计值,以适应因死亡导致的截尾情况。数据结构和分析目标以艾滋病与静脉注射经验联系研究(ALIVE)为例进行说明,在该研究中,研究人员感兴趣的是按风险行为类别比较人类免疫缺陷病毒血清转化的发病率。ALIVE研究中以区间和右截尾形式以及因死亡导致的截尾被认为是信息性的;因此,我们通过将有关血清转化与截尾之间关系的专家信息纳入模型来进行敏感性分析。