• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接近死亡与参与长期护理市场。

Proximity to death and participation in the long-term care market.

作者信息

Weaver France, Stearns Sally C, Norton Edward C, Spector William

机构信息

Swiss Health Observatory, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2009 Aug;18(8):867-83. doi: 10.1002/hec.1409.

DOI:10.1002/hec.1409
PMID:18770873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3786420/
Abstract

The extent to which increasing longevity increases per capita demand for long-term care depends on the degree to which utilization is concentrated at the end of life. We estimate the marginal effect of proximity to death, measured by being within 2 years of death, on the probabilities of nursing home and formal home care use, and we determine whether this effect differs by availability of informal care--i.e. marital status and co-residence with an adult child. The analysis uses a sample of elderly aged 70+ from the 1993-2002 Health and Retirement Study. Simultaneous probit models address the joint decisions to use long-term care and co-reside with an adult child. Overall, proximity to death significantly increases the probability of nursing home use by 50.0% and of formal home care use by 12.4%. Availability of informal support significantly reduces the effect of proximity to death. Among married elderly, proximity to death has no effect on institutionalization. In conclusion, proximity to death is one of the main drivers of long-term care use, but changes in sources of informal support, such as an increase in the proportion of married elderly, may lessen its importance in shaping the demand for long-term care.

摘要

长寿的增加在多大程度上提高人均长期护理需求,取决于护理利用集中在生命末期的程度。我们估计临近死亡(以距死亡不到2年衡量)对使用养老院和正规家庭护理概率的边际效应,并确定这种效应是否因非正式护理的可获得性(即婚姻状况和与成年子女同住)而异。该分析使用了1993 - 2002年健康与退休研究中70岁及以上老年人的样本。联立概率模型处理使用长期护理和与成年子女同住的联合决策。总体而言,临近死亡显著提高了使用养老院的概率50.0%,以及使用正规家庭护理的概率12.4%。非正式支持的可获得性显著降低了临近死亡的影响。在已婚老年人中,临近死亡对机构化没有影响。总之,临近死亡是长期护理使用的主要驱动因素之一,但非正式支持来源的变化,如已婚老年人比例的增加,可能会降低其在塑造长期护理需求方面的重要性。

相似文献

1
Proximity to death and participation in the long-term care market.接近死亡与参与长期护理市场。
Health Econ. 2009 Aug;18(8):867-83. doi: 10.1002/hec.1409.
2
A country for old men? Long-term home care utilization in Europe.老年人的国度?欧洲长期家庭护理服务的使用情况
Health Econ. 2014 Oct;23(10):1185-212. doi: 10.1002/hec.2977. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
3
The effect of longevity on spending for acute and long-term care.长寿对急性和长期护理支出的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 11;342(19):1409-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005113421906.
4
Till death do us part: the effect of marital status on health care utilization and costs at end-of-life. A register study on all colorectal cancer decedents in Norway between 2009 and 2013.至死不渝:婚姻状况对终末期卫生保健利用和成本的影响。一项针对 2009 年至 2013 年期间所有在挪威去世的结直肠癌患者的登记研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 13;20(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4794-6.
5
Relationship of place of death with care capacity and accessibility: a multilevel population study of system effects on place of death in Norway.死亡地点与护理能力和可及性的关系:挪威系统对死亡地点影响的多层次人口研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 24;20(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05283-6.
6
A European study investigating patterns of transition from home care towards institutional dementia care: the protocol of a RightTimePlaceCare study.一项针对从家庭护理向机构痴呆护理过渡模式的欧洲研究:RightTimePlaceCare 研究的方案。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 23;12:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-68.
7
The effects of state-level expenditures for home- and community-based services on the risk of becoming a long-stay nursing home resident after hip fracture.州级家庭和社区服务支出对髋部骨折后成为长期疗养院居民风险的影响。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Mar;27(3):953-961. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3327-3. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
8
How does formal and informal community care affect nursing home use?正式和非正式社区护理如何影响养老院的使用?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1995 Jan;50(1):S4-S12. doi: 10.1093/geronb/50b.1.s4.
9
Is family care on the decline? A longitudinal investigation of the substitution of formal long-term care services for informal care.家庭照料是否在减少?对正规长期护理服务替代非正规照料的纵向调查。
Milbank Q. 1993;71(4):601-24.
10
Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe?在欧洲,子女对年迈父母的非正式照料是否能替代正式照料?
J Health Econ. 2009 Jan;28(1):143-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The health and long-term care costs in the last year of life in The Netherlands.荷兰临终前一年的医疗与长期护理费用。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Feb 26. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01763-w.
2
Informal Care Costs According to Age and Proximity to Death to Support Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.根据年龄和接近死亡的程度来计算非正式护理成本,以支持成本效益分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Sep;41(9):1137-1149. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01233-8. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
3
Retrospective Evaluation of Discharge Planning Linked to a Long-Term Care 2.0 Project in a Medical Center.回顾性评估与医疗中心的长期护理 2.0 项目相关的出院计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;19(16):10139. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610139.
4
What is the marginal benefit of payment-induced family care? Impact on Medicaid spending and health of care recipients.支付诱导家庭护理的边际效益是什么?对医疗补助支出和护理接受者健康的影响。
Health Econ. 2019 May;28(5):678-692. doi: 10.1002/hec.3873. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
5
Care choices in Europe: To Each According to His or Her Needs?欧洲的护理选择:按需分配?
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018780848. doi: 10.1177/0046958018780848.
6
Trends in the use and costs of round-the-clock long-term care in the last two years of life among old people between 2002 and 2013 in Finland.2002年至2013年芬兰老年人生命最后两年全天候长期护理的使用情况及费用趋势。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 19;17(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2615-3.
7
Care utilisation in the last years of life in Sweden: the effects of gender and marital status differ by type of care.瑞典生命最后几年的医疗护理利用情况:性别和婚姻状况的影响因护理类型而异。
Eur J Ageing. 2014 Sep 10;11(4):349-359. doi: 10.1007/s10433-014-0320-1. eCollection 2014 Dec.
8
The effect of population aging on health expenditure growth: a critical review.人口老龄化对卫生支出增长的影响:一项批判性综述。
Eur J Ageing. 2013 May 15;10(4):353-361. doi: 10.1007/s10433-013-0280-x. eCollection 2013 Dec.
9
Determinants of received long-term care - Individual responses to regional nursing home provisions.接受长期护理的决定因素——个人对地区养老院供应情况的反应。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2016 Dec;19(4):326-337. doi: 10.1007/s10729-015-9333-3. Epub 2015 Jul 12.
10
A structured review of long-term care demand modelling.长期护理需求建模的结构化综述。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2015 Jun;18(2):173-94. doi: 10.1007/s10729-014-9299-6. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Counting backward to health care's future: using time-to-death modeling to identify changes in end-of-life morbidity and the impact of aging on health care expenditures.倒推医疗保健的未来:使用死亡时间模型来识别临终发病率的变化以及老龄化对医疗保健支出的影响。
Milbank Q. 2007 Jun;85(2):213-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00485.x.
2
Informal care and Medicare expenditures: testing for heterogeneous treatment effects.非正式护理与医疗保险支出:异质性治疗效果检验
J Health Econ. 2008 Jan;27(1):134-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.03.002. Epub 2007 Mar 18.
3
Population ageing and health care expenditure: a school of 'red herrings'?人口老龄化与医疗保健支出:一派“转移注意力的话题”?
Health Econ. 2007 Oct;16(10):1109-26. doi: 10.1002/hec.1213.
4
Health expenditure growth: reassessing the threat of ageing.卫生支出增长:重新评估老龄化的威胁。
Health Econ. 2006 Sep;15(9):947-63. doi: 10.1002/hec.1165.
5
Estimating probit models with self-selected treatments.估计具有自我选择治疗方法的概率单位模型。
Stat Med. 2006 Feb 15;25(3):389-413. doi: 10.1002/sim.2226.
6
The potential for cost savings in Medicare's future.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24 Suppl 2:W5R77-80. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.r77.
7
Can family caregiving substitute for nursing home care?家庭照料能否替代养老院照料?
J Health Econ. 2005 Nov;24(6):1174-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.05.001. Epub 2005 Jun 24.
8
Informal care and health care use of older adults.老年人的非正式照料与医疗保健利用情况
J Health Econ. 2004 Nov;23(6):1159-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.04.008.
9
Time to include time to death? The future of health care expenditure predictions.是否应将至死亡时间纳入考量?医疗保健支出预测的未来。
Health Econ. 2004 Apr;13(4):315-27. doi: 10.1002/hec.831.
10
Ageing and health-care expenditure: the red herring argument revisited.老龄化与医疗保健支出:再探转移注意力的论点。
Health Econ. 2004 Apr;13(4):303-14. doi: 10.1002/hec.826.