Bobashev Georgiy, Morris Robert J, Goedecke D Michael
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2008 Sep 8;3(9):e3154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003154.
Mathematical models that describe the global spread of infectious diseases such as influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and tuberculosis (TB) often consider a sample of international airports as a network supporting disease spread. However, there is no consensus on how many cities should be selected or on how to select those cities. Using airport flight data that commercial airlines reported to the Official Airline Guide (OAG) in 2000, we have examined the network characteristics of network samples obtained under different selection rules. In addition, we have examined different size samples based on largest flight volume and largest metropolitan populations. We have shown that although the bias in network characteristics increases with the reduction of the sample size, a relatively small number of areas that includes the largest airports, the largest cities, the most-connected cities, and the most central cities is enough to describe the dynamics of the global spread of influenza. The analysis suggests that a relatively small number of cities (around 200 or 300 out of almost 3000) can capture enough network information to adequately describe the global spread of a disease such as influenza. Weak traffic flows between small airports can contribute to noise and mask other means of spread such as the ground transportation.
描述流感、严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)和结核病(TB)等传染病全球传播的数学模型,通常将一部分国际机场视为支持疾病传播的网络。然而,对于应选择多少个城市以及如何选择这些城市,目前尚无共识。利用商业航空公司在2000年向官方航空公司指南(OAG)报告的机场航班数据,我们研究了在不同选择规则下获得的网络样本的网络特征。此外,我们还研究了基于最大航班量和最大都市人口的不同规模样本。我们发现,尽管网络特征的偏差会随着样本量的减少而增加,但包含最大机场、最大城市、连接最多城市和最中心城市的相对少数地区,足以描述流感全球传播的动态。分析表明,相对少数的城市(在近3000个城市中约200或300个)就能获取足够的网络信息,以充分描述流感等疾病的全球传播。小型机场之间的微弱交通流量可能会产生噪音,并掩盖其他传播途径,如地面交通。