Health Economics Program (HEP), Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2008 Sep 11;6:19. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-6-19.
This paper aims to provide a critical and systematic review of the societal costs of air pollution-related ill health (CAP), to explore methodological issues that may be important when assessing or comparing CAP across countries and to suggest ways in which future CAP studies can be made more useful for policy analysis. The methodology includes a systematic search based on the major electronic databases and the websites of a number of major international organizations. Studies are categorized by origin - OECD countries or non-OECD countries - and by publication status. Seventeen studies are included, eight from OECD countries and nine from non-OECD countries. A number of studies based on the ExternE methodology and the USA studies conducted by the Institute of Transportation are also summarized and discussed separately. The present review shows that considerable societal costs are attributable to air pollution-related health hazards. Nevertheless, given the variations in the methodologies used to calculate the estimated costs (e.g. cost estimation methods and cost components included), and inter-country differences in demographic composition and health care systems, it is difficult to compare CAP estimates across studies and countries. To increase awareness concerning the air pollution-related burden of disease, and to build links to health policy analyses, future research efforts should be directed towards theoretically sound and comprehensive CAP estimates with use of rich data. In particular, a more explicit approach should be followed to deal with uncertainties in the estimations. Along with monetary estimates, future research should also report all physical impacts and source-specific cost estimates, and should attempt to estimate 'avoidable cost' using alternative counterfactual scenarios.
本文旨在对与空气污染相关的健康危害(CAP)的社会成本进行批判性和系统性的回顾,探讨在评估或比较不同国家的 CAP 时可能很重要的方法学问题,并提出未来 CAP 研究如何更有助于政策分析的方法。该方法包括基于主要电子数据库和一些主要国际组织网站的系统搜索。研究按起源(经合组织国家或非经合组织国家)和出版状态进行分类。共纳入 17 项研究,其中 8 项来自经合组织国家,9 项来自非经合组织国家。还分别总结和讨论了一些基于 ExternE 方法学和美国交通研究所进行的研究。本综述表明,相当大的社会成本归因于与空气污染相关的健康危害。然而,鉴于用于计算估计成本的方法(例如,成本估算方法和包括的成本组成部分)存在差异,以及国家之间在人口构成和医疗保健系统方面存在差异,因此难以比较不同研究和国家的 CAP 估计值。为了提高对与空气污染相关的疾病负担的认识,并将其与健康政策分析联系起来,未来的研究工作应致力于使用丰富的数据进行理论上合理且全面的 CAP 估计。特别是,应采取更明确的方法来处理估算中的不确定性。除了货币估算外,未来的研究还应报告所有物理影响和特定来源的成本估算,并应尝试使用替代反事实情景来估计“可避免成本”。