Donohoe Gary, Spoletini Ilaria, McGlade Nicola, Behan Caragh, Hayden Judy, O'Donoghue Therese, Peel Rosie, Haq Farhan, Walker Christopher, O'Callaghan Eadbhard, Spalletta Gianfranco, Gill Michael, Corvin Aiden
Neuropsychiatric Genetics Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Oct 30;161(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.10.001. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
Attributional style is defined as the pervasive tendency to explain the cause of social actions in terms of oneself, or others, or the context of the event. While the clinical correlates of this aspect of social cognition have been widely researched, its links with relationship style and neuropsychological performance, although hypothesised, have received less attention. This study investigated whether attributional style is predicted by variance in either relationship style or neuropsychological performance in schizophrenia. We assessed attributional style (using the Internal, Personal and Situational Attributions Questionnaire [IPSAQ]), relationship style (using Bartholomew and Horowitz's Relationship Questionnaire), and neuropsychological function (using the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, the Wechsler Memory Test, and the Cambridge Automated Test Battery) in 73 stabilised outpatients with chronic schizophrenia and 78 controls matched for age and gender. 'Externalising bias' (attributing positive rather than negative events to oneself) was predicted by verbal ability in both patients and controls. 'Personalising bias' (attributing negative events to others rather than to situational factors) was predicted by higher secure relationship style ratings, but only in the patient group. This study highlights the importance of relationship style and neuropsychological performance for different aspects of attributional style in schizophrenia.
归因风格被定义为一种普遍倾向,即从自身、他人或事件背景的角度来解释社会行为的原因。虽然社会认知这一方面的临床相关性已得到广泛研究,但其与关系风格和神经心理表现的联系,尽管有人提出了假设,但受到的关注较少。本研究调查了精神分裂症患者的关系风格或神经心理表现的差异是否能预测归因风格。我们对73名病情稳定的慢性精神分裂症门诊患者和78名年龄及性别匹配的对照组进行了评估,评估内容包括归因风格(使用内部、个人和情境归因问卷[IPSAQ])、关系风格(使用巴塞洛缪和霍洛维茨的关系问卷)以及神经心理功能(使用韦氏智力简表、韦氏记忆测验和剑桥自动化测试组)。在患者和对照组中,语言能力都能预测“外化偏差”(将积极而非消极事件归因于自己)。更高的安全型关系风格评分能预测“个性化偏差”(将消极事件归因于他人而非情境因素),但仅在患者组中如此。本研究强调了关系风格和神经心理表现在精神分裂症归因风格不同方面的重要性。