Peters Maarten J V, Jelicic Marko, Gorski Benny, Sijstermans Kevin, Giesbrecht Timo, Merckelbach Harald
Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Oct;129(2):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.08.007.
Effects of attention control and forewarning on the activation and monitoring of experimentally induced false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm were investigated in a young adult sample (N=77). We found that reducing the degree of attention during encoding led to a decrease in veridical recall and an increase in non-presented critical lure intrusions. This effect could not be counteracted by a forewarning instruction. However, these findings did not emerge in a (retrieval supportive) recognition task. It seems that divided attention increases false recall when attention control and forewarning have to compete for limited cognitive resources in a generative free recall as opposed to a retrieval supportive recognition task. Forewarning instructions do not always protect young adults against experimentally induced false memories.
在一个年轻成人样本（N = 77）中，研究了注意力控制和预警对Deese/Roediger-McDermott范式中实验诱导的错误记忆的激活和监测的影响。我们发现，在编码过程中降低注意力程度会导致真实回忆减少，以及未呈现的关键诱饵侵入增加。这种影响无法通过预警指令来抵消。然而，在（支持检索的）识别任务中并未出现这些结果。似乎当注意力控制和预警在生成性自由回忆中必须争夺有限的认知资源时，与支持检索的识别任务相反，分散注意力会增加错误回忆。预警指令并不总是能保护年轻人免受实验诱导的错误记忆的影响。
