Department of Counselor Education and Counseling Psychology, College of Education, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881, USA.
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2011 Dec;48(4):336-41. doi: 10.1037/a0022067. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
Twelve graduate-level supervisees were interviewed regarding their experiences of supervisor self-disclosure (SRSD); data were analyzed using consensual qualitative research. When describing a specific SRSD experience, supervisees reported a range of antecedents (e.g., difficult clinical situation, self-doubt, tension in supervision relationship) followed by supervisor disclosures about clinical experiences or personal information. Supervisees perceived that their supervisors disclosed primarily to normalize, but also to build rapport and to instruct. The SRSDs had mostly positive effects (e.g., normalization), though some negative effects (e.g., deleterious impact on supervision relationship) were reported. Implications of these findings for supervision, training, and research are addressed.
十二名研究生水平的被督导者接受了关于其主管自我披露(SRSD)经验的访谈;使用共识定性研究对数据进行了分析。在描述特定的 SRSD 经验时,被督导者报告了一系列的前因(例如,困难的临床情况、自我怀疑、监督关系紧张),随后主管披露了与临床经验或个人信息有关的内容。被督导者认为他们的主管主要是为了使情况正常化而披露,但也为了建立融洽关系和指导。这些 SRSD 主要产生了积极的影响(例如,正常化),尽管也有一些负面影响(例如,对监督关系产生不利影响)被报道。这些发现对监督、培训和研究的意义在文中得到了探讨。