Weng Li-Chueh, Huang Hsiu-Li, Wilkie Diana J, Hoenig Noreen A, Suarez Marie L, Marschke Michael, Durham Jan
School of Nursing, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Apr;37(4):642-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.03.023. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) scores have shown potential for prognosticating survival in Caucasian samples, but have not been studied for prognostic value in cancer patients from minority groups. Using data obtained from a retrospective chart audit of 492 cancer patients admitted over an 18-month period to a minority-serving home-based hospice and palliative care program, we examined the relationship between PPS scores and length of survival (survival days). Patients with PPS scores of 10% to 30% had fewer survival days than those with scores of 40% and those with scores of 50% to 100% (median=6, 19, and 34 days, respectively; F=25.02, P<0.001). A PPS score of 40% serves as a reliable inclusion criterion for a study requiring two weeks for completion, whereas 50% to 100% is required for a three-week study. Findings from a predominantly minority sample are similar to those from predominantly Caucasian samples.
姑息治疗表现量表(PPS)评分已显示出在白种人样本中对生存进行预后评估的潜力,但尚未针对少数群体癌症患者的预后价值进行研究。利用从一项对492名癌症患者进行的回顾性病历审核中获得的数据,这些患者在18个月期间被收治到一个为少数群体服务的居家临终关怀和姑息治疗项目中,我们研究了PPS评分与生存时长(生存天数)之间的关系。PPS评分为10%至30%的患者的生存天数少于评分为40%的患者以及评分为50%至100%的患者(中位数分别为6天、19天和34天;F = 25.02,P < 0.001)。PPS评分为40%可作为一项需要两周完成的研究的可靠纳入标准,而一项为期三周的研究则需要评分为50%至100%。来自以少数群体为主的样本的研究结果与来自以白种人为主的样本的结果相似。