• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国护理学学士课程中护理专业学生的批判性思维与学习风格

Critical thinking and learning styles of nursing students at the Baccalaureate nursing program in Korea.

作者信息

Gyeong Ju An, Myung Sook Yoo

机构信息

Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, South Korea.

出版信息

Contemp Nurse. 2008 May;29(1):100-9. doi: 10.5172/conu.673.29.1.100.

DOI:10.5172/conu.673.29.1.100
PMID:18844547
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the critical thinking dispositions and learning styles, as well as the relationships between critical thinking and learning styles of nursing students enrolled in Baccalaureate nursing programs in Korea. The convenient sample consisted of 724 students from five cities. The learning style inventory of Kolb (1976) and critical thinking disposition inventory of Rudd et al (2000) were used for collecting data. Learning styles of the subjects were Diverging 315 (43.5%), Accommodating 223 (30.4%), Assimilating 78 (10.8%), and Converging 65 (9.0%). There were no significant differences in learning styles among grades (p=.197). The level of critical thinking significantly differed among learning styles (p=.000), and grades (p=.043). Critical thinking positively related to learning styles (r=.219) and grades (r=.097). This study suggested that adopting Abstract Conceptualization and Active Experimentation modes of pedagogy may promote critical thinking.

摘要

本研究旨在考察韩国护理学学士项目中护理专业学生的批判性思维倾向和学习风格,以及批判性思维与学习风格之间的关系。便利样本由来自五个城市的724名学生组成。采用Kolb(1976)的学习风格量表和Rudd等人(2000)的批判性思维倾向量表收集数据。受试者的学习风格为发散型315人(43.5%)、顺应型223人(30.4%)、聚合型78人(10.8%)和同化型65人(9.0%)。各年级之间的学习风格无显著差异(p = 0.197)。批判性思维水平在学习风格(p = 0.000)和年级(p = 0.043)之间存在显著差异。批判性思维与学习风格呈正相关(r = 0.219),与年级呈正相关(r = 0.097)。本研究表明,采用抽象概念化和主动实验的教学模式可能会促进批判性思维。

相似文献

1
Critical thinking and learning styles of nursing students at the Baccalaureate nursing program in Korea.韩国护理学学士课程中护理专业学生的批判性思维与学习风格
Contemp Nurse. 2008 May;29(1):100-9. doi: 10.5172/conu.673.29.1.100.
2
Critical thinking dispositions and learning styles of baccalaureate nursing students from China.中国护理学本科学生的批判性思维倾向与学习风格
Nurs Health Sci. 2008 Sep;10(3):175-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2008.00393.x.
3
Critical thinking and learning styles of students in conventional and accelerated programmes.传统课程和加速课程中学生的批判性思维与学习风格
Int Nurs Rev. 2006 Mar;53(1):73-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2006.00445.x.
4
Learning styles and critical thinking relationship in baccalaureate nursing education: a systematic review.护理学本科教育中学习风格与批判性思维的关系:一项系统综述
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Mar;34(3):362-71. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
5
Relationships between critical thinking dispositions and learning styles.批判性思维倾向与学习风格之间的关系。
J Prof Nurs. 1999 Sep-Oct;15(5):294-301. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(99)80055-6.
6
The Relationship Between Critical Thinking Skills and Learning Styles and Academic Achievement of Nursing Students.护生批判性思维技能与学习风格与学业成绩的关系。
J Nurs Res. 2019 Aug;27(4):e38. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000307.
7
Critical thinking dispositions in baccalaureate nursing students.本科护理专业学生的批判性思维倾向
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Oct;56(2):182-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03995.x.
8
Learning styles of first-year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students: a cross-sectional survey utilising the Kolb Learning Style Inventory.本科护生和助产学新生学习风格的研究:利用 Kolb 学习风格量表的横断面调查。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Jul;32(5):506-15. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
9
[A longitudinal study of critical thinking dispositions & critical thinking skills in baccalaureate nursing students].[本科护理专业学生批判性思维倾向与批判性思维技能的纵向研究]
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2005 Apr;35(2):382-9. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2005.35.2.382.
10
An investigation of learning styles of practical and baccalaureate nursing students.
J Nurs Educ. 1996 Jan;35(1):40-2. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19960101-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical thinking in nursing and midwifery learning: Quantitative and qualitative review.护理与助产学习中的批判性思维:定量与定性综述
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Feb 26;13:47. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_528_23. eCollection 2024.
2
The correlation of metacognitive ability, self-directed learning ability and critical thinking in nursing students: A cross-sectional study.护生元认知能力、自我导向学习能力与批判性思维的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2021 Mar;8(2):936-945. doi: 10.1002/nop2.702. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
3
The evaluation of simulation maket in nursing education and the determination of learning style of students.
护理教育中模拟市场的评估及学生学习风格的确定。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):74-79.
4
The evaluation of simulation market in nursing education and the determination of learning style of students.护理教育中模拟市场的评估及学生学习风格的确定。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):1-6.