• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灾害研究中的参与式行动研究方法:世界贸易中心疏散研究的结果

Participatory action research methodology in disaster research: results from the World Trade Center evacuation study.

作者信息

Gershon Robyn R M, Rubin Marcie S, Qureshi Kristine A, Canton Allison N, Matzner Frederick J

机构信息

Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008 Oct;2(3):142-9. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e318184b48f.

DOI:10.1097/DMP.0b013e318184b48f
PMID:18845929
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Participatory action research (PAR) methodology is an effective tool in identifying and implementing risk-reduction interventions. It has been used extensively in occupational health research, but not, to our knowledge, in disaster research. A PAR framework was incorporated into the World Trade Center evacuation study, which was designed to identify the individual, organizational, and structural (environmental) factors that affected evacuation from the World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 on September 11, 2001. PAR teams-comprising World Trade Center evacuees, study investigators, and expert consultants-worked collaboratively to develop a set of recommendations designed to facilitate evacuation from high-rise office buildings and reduce risk of injury among evacuees.

METHODS

Two PAR teams worked first separately and then collectively to identify data-driven strategies for improvement of high-rise building evacuation.

RESULTS

The teams identified interventions targeting individual, organizational, and structural (environmental) barriers to safe and rapid evacuation.

CONCLUSIONS

PAR teams were effective in identifying numerous feasible and cost-effective strategies for improvement of high-rise emergency preparedness and evacuation. This approach may have utility in other workplace disaster prevention planning and response programs.

摘要

目的

参与式行动研究(PAR)方法是识别和实施风险降低干预措施的有效工具。它已在职业健康研究中广泛应用,但据我们所知,尚未用于灾害研究。一个PAR框架被纳入世界贸易中心疏散研究,该研究旨在识别影响2001年9月11日从世界贸易中心1号楼和2号楼疏散的个人、组织和结构(环境)因素。由世界贸易中心疏散者、研究调查人员和专家顾问组成的PAR团队共同合作,制定了一套建议,旨在促进从高层办公楼疏散并降低疏散者受伤风险。

方法

两个PAR团队首先分别开展工作,然后共同确定以数据为驱动的改善高层建筑疏散的策略。

结果

团队确定了针对安全快速疏散的个人、组织和结构(环境)障碍的干预措施。

结论

PAR团队有效地识别了众多可行且具有成本效益的改善高层应急准备和疏散的策略。这种方法可能在其他工作场所灾害预防规划和应对计划中具有实用性。

相似文献

1
Participatory action research methodology in disaster research: results from the World Trade Center evacuation study.灾害研究中的参与式行动研究方法:世界贸易中心疏散研究的结果
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008 Oct;2(3):142-9. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e318184b48f.
2
Factors associated with high-rise evacuation: qualitative results from the World Trade Center Evacuation Study.与高层疏散相关的因素:世界贸易中心疏散研究的定性结果。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007 May-Jun;22(3):165-73. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x0000460x.
3
Evacuating damaged and destroyed buildings on 9/11: behavioral and structural barriers.9·11 事件中损毁建筑的人员搜救:行为和结构障碍。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Dec;28(6):556-66. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13008996. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
4
Emergency Preparedness Safety Climate and Other Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among World Trade Center Disaster Evacuees.世贸中心灾难撤离者的应急准备、安全氛围及与心理健康结果相关的其他因素
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017 Jun;11(3):326-336. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2016.136. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
5
Roadmap for the protection of disaster research participants: findings from the World Trade Center Evacuation Study.保护灾难研究参与者路线图:世界贸易中心疏散研究的结果
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):486-93. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00005306.
6
Surveillance for World Trade Center disaster health effects among survivors of collapsed and damaged buildings.对世贸中心倒塌和受损建筑幸存者的健康影响进行监测。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006 Apr 7;55(2):1-18.
7
Protecting worker and public health during responses to catastrophic disasters-learning from the World Trade Center experience.在应对灾难性灾难时保护工人和公众健康——从世界贸易中心事件中吸取经验教训。
Am J Ind Med. 2014 Nov;57(11):1285-98. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22386. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
8
A critique of the official report on the evacuation of the World Trade Center: continued doubts.对官方报道的世贸中心疏散情况的批评:持续存在的疑问。
Disasters. 2013 Oct;37(4):695-704. doi: 10.1111/disa.12029.
9
Risk of large-scale evacuation based on the effectiveness of rescue strategies under different crowd densities.基于不同人群密度下救援策略有效性的大规模疏散风险。
Risk Anal. 2013 Aug;33(8):1553-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01923.x. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
10
Workplace and safety perceptions among New York City employees after the 9/11 attacks.9·11 袭击事件后纽约市员工的工作场所和安全认知。
Arch Environ Occup Health. 2021;76(7):363-371. doi: 10.1080/19338244.2020.1835797. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploratory Qualitative Study of Fire Preparedness Among High-rise Building Residents.高层建筑居民火灾防范意识的探索性定性研究
PLoS Curr. 2018 Aug 31;10:ecurrents.dis.aa27444baa486dc3d5b3fa7c28009b22. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.aa27444baa486dc3d5b3fa7c28009b22.
2
Experiences of using a participatory action research approach to strengthen district local capacity in Eastern Uganda.运用参与式行动研究方法增强乌干达东部地区地方能力的经验。
Glob Health Action. 2017 Aug;10(sup4):1346038. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1346038.
3
Quality of Life of Persons Injured on 9/11: Qualitative Analysis from the World Trade Center Health Registry.
9·11事件受害者的生活质量:来自世界贸易中心健康登记处的定性分析。
PLoS Curr. 2016 Oct 27;8:ecurrents.dis.7c70f66c1e6c5f41b43c797cb2a04793. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.7c70f66c1e6c5f41b43c797cb2a04793.
4
Psychosocial Influences on Disaster Preparedness in San Francisco Recipients of Home Care.《接受居家护理的旧金山居民的灾难准备中的心理社会影响》。
J Urban Health. 2017 Oct;94(5):606-618. doi: 10.1007/s11524-016-0104-3.
5
Opportunities and challenges associated with engaging immigrant women in participatory action research.参与式行动研究中吸引移民妇女所面临的机遇和挑战。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2013 Apr;15(2):341-9. doi: 10.1007/s10903-012-9622-6.
6
Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials.实施研究设计:将参与式行动研究纳入随机对照试验。
Implement Sci. 2009 Oct 23;4:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-69.