Hornsveld Ruud H J, Muris Peter, Kraaimaat Floris W, Meesters Cor
Forensic Psychiatric Center De Kijvelanden, Poortugaal, Netherlands.
Assessment. 2009 Jun;16(2):181-92. doi: 10.1177/1073191108325894. Epub 2008 Oct 13.
The psychometric properties of a Dutch version of Buss and Perry's Aggression Questionnaire (AQ) were examined in a sample of violent forensic psychiatric inpatients and outpatients and a sample of secondary vocational students. The internal consistency, interitem correlations, and item-scale correlations of the subscales Physical Aggression, Anger, and Hostility were good but turned out to be unsatisfactory for the subscale Verbal Aggression. The four-factor structure of the AQ could not be confirmed, but the four-factor structure of a 12-item version (short form) of the AQ, the AQ-SF, produced an acceptable fit. The test-retest reliability of the AQ and AQ-SF total scores was good, although the test-retest reliability of the AQ-SF subscale Physical Aggression was not satisfactory. The validity of both the AQ and AQ-SF could be demonstrated by meaningful correlations with alternative measures of aggression and personality, but inpatients were not found to display higher scores on the AQ or AQ-SF than the students.
在一组暴力法医精神病住院患者和门诊患者以及一组中等职业学校学生样本中,对荷兰版的布斯与佩里攻击性问卷(AQ)的心理测量特性进行了检验。身体攻击、愤怒和敌意分量表的内部一致性、项目间相关性以及项目与量表的相关性良好,但言语攻击分量表的结果不尽人意。AQ的四因素结构未能得到证实,但AQ的一个12项版本(简版)即AQ-SF的四因素结构拟合度尚可。AQ和AQ-SF总分的重测信度良好,不过AQ-SF身体攻击分量表的重测信度并不令人满意。AQ和AQ-SF的效度都可以通过与攻击性和人格的替代测量指标之间有意义的相关性来证明,但未发现住院患者在AQ或AQ-SF上的得分高于学生。