Abravanel E, DeYong N G
Department of Psychology, George Washington University.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1991 Aug;52(1):22-40. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(91)90004-c.
One interpretation of the evidence for early imitative-like matching of facial gestures is that the acts are elicited by stimulus properties, rather than constructed by the infant. Verification of this possibility requires presentation of object models to determine whether infants reliably respond to them with movement-matching gestures. Two object models, one simulating tongue movements and the other mouth opening/closing, were presented to younger infants (median age = 5 weeks) and to older ones (median age = 12 weeks) under systematically varied movement conditions. Additionally, a live model presented tongue protrusion and mouth opening gestures to the same infants. Findings of two studies were similar. At neither age was there reliable elicitation of facial gestures by either object model, which suggests that most infants were not imitating the object movements or responding to them in a way that verifies elicitation of facial matches by object presentation. Live modeling of tongue extensions, however, did increase the incidence of partial tongue protrusions among infants at 5 weeks, which supports previous research.
对于早期面部手势模仿样匹配证据的一种解释是,这些行为是由刺激属性引发的,而非婴儿构建的。要验证这种可能性,需要呈现物体模型,以确定婴儿是否会通过动作匹配手势对其做出可靠反应。在系统变化的运动条件下,向年龄较小的婴儿(中位年龄 = 5周)和年龄较大的婴儿(中位年龄 = 12周)呈现了两个物体模型,一个模拟舌头运动,另一个模拟嘴巴开合。此外,一个活体模型向相同的婴儿呈现了伸舌和张嘴手势。两项研究的结果相似。在这两个年龄段,物体模型均未可靠地引发面部手势,这表明大多数婴儿没有模仿物体运动,或以验证通过物体呈现引发面部匹配的方式对其做出反应。然而,对5周大婴儿进行伸舌的活体示范,确实增加了部分伸舌的发生率,这支持了先前的研究。