Brodie Fiona G, Atkins Emily R, Robinson Thompson G, Panerai Ronney B
Ageing and Stroke Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK.
Clin Sci (Lond). 2009 Mar;116(6):513-20. doi: 10.1042/CS20080236.
Spontaneous fluctuations in BP (blood pressure) and subsequent change in CBFV (cerebral blood flow velocity) in the MCA (middle cerebral artery) can be used to assess dynamic cerebral autoregulation using transfer function analysis; however, the reliability of this technique has not been assessed, in particular the contribution of intra-subject variability relative to inter-subject variability. Three bilateral CBFV, BP and RR interval recordings were performed in ten healthy volunteers on four separate occasions over a 2-week period. Data were analysed to provide the ARI (autoregulatory index), CBFV, RAP (resistance-area product) and CrCP (critical closing pressure). We also measured systolic and diastolic BP, and resting HR (heart rate). We calculated the SEM (standard error of measurement) and the ICC (intra-class correlation coefficient) and their 95% CIs (confidence intervals) for each parameter to assess their absolute (intra-subject) and relative (inter-subject) reliability. The CV (coefficient of variation) of SEM ranged from 1.7% (for CBFV) to 100.0% (for RAP), whereas the ICC was <0.5 for ARI, rising to >0.8 for CBFV and diastolic BP. These data demonstrate excellent absolute and relative reliability of CBFV, whereas ARI is of comparable reliability with the measurement of HR. Using these results it is possible to determine the sample size required to demonstrate a change in ARI, with a sample of 45 subjects in each group required to show a change in ARI of 1, whereas to detect a change in ARI >2 would require only 11 subjects per group. The results of the present study could be valuable to the future planning of cerebral autoregulation studies, but more work is needed to understand the determinants of intra-subject variability in autoregulatory parameters.
利用传递函数分析,大脑中动脉(MCA)血压(BP)的自发波动以及随后脑血流速度(CBFV)的变化可用于评估动态脑自动调节;然而,该技术的可靠性尚未得到评估,尤其是受试者内变异性相对于受试者间变异性的贡献。在为期2周的时间内,对10名健康志愿者分4次进行了双侧CBFV、BP和RR间期记录。对数据进行分析以得出自动调节指数(ARI)、CBFV、阻力-面积乘积(RAP)和临界关闭压(CrCP)。我们还测量了收缩压和舒张压以及静息心率(HR)。我们计算了每个参数的测量标准误差(SEM)和组内相关系数(ICC)及其95%置信区间(CIs),以评估其绝对(受试者内)和相对(受试者间)可靠性。SEM的变异系数(CV)范围为1.7%(CBFV)至100.0%(RAP),而ARI的ICC<0.5,CBFV和舒张压的ICC则升至>0.8。这些数据表明CBFV具有出色的绝对和相对可靠性,而ARI与HR测量的可靠性相当。利用这些结果,可以确定证明ARI变化所需的样本量,每组需要45名受试者才能显示ARI变化1,而要检测ARI>2的变化,每组仅需要11名受试者。本研究结果可能对未来脑自动调节研究的规划有价值,但需要更多工作来了解自动调节参数中受试者内变异性的决定因素。