Hwang Ula, Richardson Lynne, Livote Elayne, Harris Ben, Spencer Natasha, Sean Morrison R
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1248-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00267.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of emergency department (ED) crowding factors with the quality of pain care.
This was a retrospective observational study of all adult patients (> or =18 years) with conditions warranting pain care seen at an academic, urban, tertiary care ED from July 1 to July 31, 2005, and December 1 to December 31, 2005. Patients were included if they presented with a chief complaint of pain and a final ED diagnosis of a painful condition. Predictor ED crowding variables studied were 1) census, 2) number of admitted patients waiting for inpatient beds (boarders), and 3) number of boarders divided by ED census (boarding burden). The outcomes of interest were process of pain care measures: documentation of clinician pain assessment, medications ordered, and times of activities (e.g., arrival, assessment, ordering of medications).
A total of 1,068 patient visits were reviewed. Fewer patients received analgesic medication during periods of high census (>50th percentile; parameter estimate = -0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.80 to -0.07). There was a direct correlation with total ED census and increased time to pain assessment (Spearman r = 0.33, p < 0.0001), time to analgesic medication ordering (r = 0.22, p < 0.0001), and time to analgesic medication administration (r = 0.25, p < 0.0001). There were significant delays (>1 hour) for pain assessment and the ordering and administration of analgesic medication during periods of high ED census and number of boarders, but not with boarding burden.
ED crowding as measured by patient volume negatively impacts patient care. Greater numbers of patients in the ED, whether as total census or number of boarders, were associated with worse pain care.
本研究的目的是评估急诊科拥挤因素与疼痛护理质量之间的关联。
这是一项回顾性观察研究,研究对象为2005年7月1日至7月31日以及2005年12月1日至12月31日期间在一所城市学术性三级护理急诊科就诊的所有需要疼痛护理的成年患者(≥18岁)。如果患者以疼痛为主诉就诊且急诊科最终诊断为疼痛性疾病,则纳入研究。研究的急诊科拥挤预测变量为:1)普查人数,2)等待住院床位的住院患者数量(寄宿患者),3)寄宿患者数量除以急诊科普查人数(寄宿负担)。感兴趣的结果是疼痛护理措施的过程:临床医生疼痛评估的记录、开具的药物以及各项活动的时间(如到达、评估、开具药物的时间)。
共审查了1068例患者就诊情况。在普查人数较多时期(>第50百分位数;参数估计值=-0.47;95%置信区间[CI]=-0.80至-0.07),接受镇痛药物治疗的患者较少。急诊科总普查人数与疼痛评估时间延长(Spearman相关系数r=0.33,p<0.0001)、开具镇痛药物的时间延长(r=0.22,p<0.0001)以及给予镇痛药物的时间延长(r=0.25,p<0.0001)直接相关。在急诊科普查人数较多和寄宿患者数量较多的时期,疼痛评估以及开具和给予镇痛药物存在显著延迟(>1小时),但与寄宿负担无关。
以患者数量衡量的急诊科拥挤对患者护理产生负面影响。急诊科患者数量越多,无论是总普查人数还是寄宿患者数量,与疼痛护理质量越差相关。