Spreckley Michèle, Boyd Roslyn
Uncle Bobs Child Development Centre, Department of Developmental Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
J Pediatr. 2009 Mar;154(3):338-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.09.012. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
To review the effectiveness of applied behavior intervention (ABI) programs for preschool children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in their cognitive, adaptive behavior, and language development.
Systematic reviews, randomized or quasirandomized controlled trials (RCT) of ABI delivered to preschool children with ASD were reviewed. Quantitative data on cognitive, language, and behavior outcomes were extracted and pooled for meta-analysis (RevMan 4.2).
Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Six of these were randomized comparison trials with adequate methodologic quality (PEDro >or= 6). Meta-analysis of 4 studies concluded that, compared with standard care, ABI programs did not significantly improve the cognitive outcomes of children in the experimental group who scored a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.38 (95%CI -0.09 to 0.84; P = .1). There was no additional benefit over standard care for expressive language; SMD of 0.37 (95%CI -0.09 to 0.84; P = .11), for receptive language; SMD of 0.29 (95%CI -0.17 to 0.74; P = .22) or adaptive behavior; SMD of 0.30 (95%CI -0.16 to 0.77; P = .20).
Currently there is inadequate evidence that ABI has better outcomes than standard care for children with autism. Appropriately powered clinical trials with broader outcomes are required.
回顾应用行为干预(ABI)项目对患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的学龄前儿童在认知、适应性行为和语言发展方面的有效性。
对针对患有ASD的学龄前儿童实施的ABI的系统评价、随机或半随机对照试验(RCT)进行了综述。提取了关于认知、语言和行为结果的定量数据并进行汇总,以进行荟萃分析(RevMan 4.2)。
13项研究符合纳入标准。其中6项为方法学质量良好(PEDro≥6)的随机对照试验。对4项研究的荟萃分析得出结论,与标准护理相比,ABI项目并未显著改善实验组儿童的认知结果,标准化均数差(SMD)为0.38(95%CI -0.09至0.84;P = 0.1)。在表达性语言方面,与标准护理相比没有额外益处;表达性语言的SMD为0.37(95%CI -0.09至0.84;P = 0.11),接受性语言的SMD为0.29(95%CI -0.17至0.74;P = 0.22),适应性行为的SMD为0.30(95%CI -0.16至0.77;P = 0.20)。
目前没有足够的证据表明ABI对自闭症儿童的效果优于标准护理。需要进行有足够效力且结果更广泛的临床试验。