Suppr超能文献

应用行为干预对自闭症学龄前儿童认知、语言和适应性行为改善的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of applied behavioral intervention in preschool children with autism for improving cognitive, language, and adaptive behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Spreckley Michèle, Boyd Roslyn

机构信息

Uncle Bobs Child Development Centre, Department of Developmental Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2009 Mar;154(3):338-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.09.012. Epub 2008 Oct 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the effectiveness of applied behavior intervention (ABI) programs for preschool children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in their cognitive, adaptive behavior, and language development.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic reviews, randomized or quasirandomized controlled trials (RCT) of ABI delivered to preschool children with ASD were reviewed. Quantitative data on cognitive, language, and behavior outcomes were extracted and pooled for meta-analysis (RevMan 4.2).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Six of these were randomized comparison trials with adequate methodologic quality (PEDro >or= 6). Meta-analysis of 4 studies concluded that, compared with standard care, ABI programs did not significantly improve the cognitive outcomes of children in the experimental group who scored a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.38 (95%CI -0.09 to 0.84; P = .1). There was no additional benefit over standard care for expressive language; SMD of 0.37 (95%CI -0.09 to 0.84; P = .11), for receptive language; SMD of 0.29 (95%CI -0.17 to 0.74; P = .22) or adaptive behavior; SMD of 0.30 (95%CI -0.16 to 0.77; P = .20).

CONCLUSIONS

Currently there is inadequate evidence that ABI has better outcomes than standard care for children with autism. Appropriately powered clinical trials with broader outcomes are required.

摘要

目的

回顾应用行为干预(ABI)项目对患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的学龄前儿童在认知、适应性行为和语言发展方面的有效性。

研究设计

对针对患有ASD的学龄前儿童实施的ABI的系统评价、随机或半随机对照试验(RCT)进行了综述。提取了关于认知、语言和行为结果的定量数据并进行汇总,以进行荟萃分析(RevMan 4.2)。

结果

13项研究符合纳入标准。其中6项为方法学质量良好(PEDro≥6)的随机对照试验。对4项研究的荟萃分析得出结论,与标准护理相比,ABI项目并未显著改善实验组儿童的认知结果,标准化均数差(SMD)为0.38(95%CI -0.09至0.84;P = 0.1)。在表达性语言方面,与标准护理相比没有额外益处;表达性语言的SMD为0.37(95%CI -0.09至0.84;P = 0.11),接受性语言的SMD为0.29(95%CI -0.17至0.74;P = 0.22),适应性行为的SMD为0.30(95%CI -0.16至0.77;P = 0.20)。

结论

目前没有足够的证据表明ABI对自闭症儿童的效果优于标准护理。需要进行有足够效力且结果更广泛的临床试验。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验