• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

红毛猩猩(婆罗洲猩猩)和倭黑猩猩会通过指示告知人类工具的位置。

Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) point to inform a human about the location of a tool.

作者信息

Zimmermann Felizitas, Zemke Franziska, Call Josep, Gómez Juan Carlos

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2009 Mar;12(2):347-58. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0194-8. Epub 2008 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-008-0194-8
PMID:18953583
Abstract

Although pointing is not part of great apes' natural gestural repertoire, they can learn to point to food, in order to request it. To assess the flexibility with which they can use this gesture, one can vary the potential referent of the point. In two previous studies, three orangutans (two of them human-reared) have shown the ability to point to the location of a tool which a human experimenter needed in order to give them food. Here, we tested six orangutans and five bonobos using a set-up in which our subjects had to guide a human experimenter to the hiding place of a fork which was needed in order to retrieve a piece of food for the subject out of a vertical tube. We further examined the potential role of a competitive/deceptive context by varying the identity of the person responsible for hiding the tool. In addition, we implemented three different control conditions in which an object was hidden but it was not necessary to indicate its location to get the food. We found that the majority of subjects spontaneously guided the experimenter to the hiding place of the fork by pointing to it when it was necessary and they did so significantly less in control conditions. We did not find an effect of the person hiding the fork. Our results show that mother-reared orangutans and bonobos are able to point to inform a human about the location of an object that the human needs to procure food for the subject and that they can take into account whether it is relevant or not to do so.

摘要

尽管指物并非大猩猩自然手势语库的一部分,但它们能够学会指向食物以获取食物。为了评估它们使用这种手势的灵活性,可以改变指物的潜在指代对象。在之前的两项研究中,三只猩猩(其中两只由人类抚养长大)已表现出能够指向人类实验者获取食物所需工具的位置。在此,我们使用一种设置对六只猩猩和五只倭黑猩猩进行了测试,在该设置中,我们的实验对象必须引导人类实验者找到一把叉子的隐藏位置,以便从垂直管中为实验对象取出一块食物。我们通过改变负责隐藏工具的人的身份,进一步研究了竞争/欺骗情境的潜在作用。此外,我们实施了三种不同的对照条件,在这些条件下,一个物体被隐藏起来,但无需指明其位置就能获取食物。我们发现,大多数实验对象在有必要时会自发地通过指向叉子的隐藏位置来引导实验者,而在对照条件下这样做的次数明显减少。我们没有发现隐藏叉子的人的身份产生影响。我们的研究结果表明,由母亲抚养长大的猩猩和倭黑猩猩能够通过指物告知人类获取食物所需物体的位置,并且它们能够考虑这样做是否相关。

相似文献

1
Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) point to inform a human about the location of a tool.红毛猩猩(婆罗洲猩猩)和倭黑猩猩会通过指示告知人类工具的位置。
Anim Cogn. 2009 Mar;12(2):347-58. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0194-8. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
2
Token transfers among great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Pan troglodytes): species differences, gestural requests, and reciprocal exchange.大猩猩(西部大猩猩、婆罗洲猩猩、倭黑猩猩和黑猩猩)之间的代币转移:物种差异、手势请求和互惠交换。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Nov;123(4):375-84. doi: 10.1037/a0017253.
3
The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task.倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)、黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)和红毛猩猩(Pongo pygmaeus)在两种版本的物体选择任务中的表现。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Aug;123(3):304-9. doi: 10.1037/a0016222.
4
A novel test of planning ability: great apes can plan step-by-step but not in advance of action.一项关于计划能力的新测试:大猩猩能够逐步制定计划,但不能在行动之前提前规划。
Behav Processes. 2013 Nov;100:174-84. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 20.
5
Great apes' (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus) understanding of tool functional properties after limited experience.大猩猩(黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩、红毛猩猩)在有限经验后对工具功能特性的理解。
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):220-30. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.220.
6
Spontaneous use of tools as straws in great apes.猿类自发使用吸管等工具。
Anim Cogn. 2011 Mar;14(2):213-26. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0355-4. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
7
The limits of endowment effects in great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus).大型猿类(矮黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩、红毛猩猩)禀赋效应的局限性
J Comp Psychol. 2011 Nov;125(4):436-45. doi: 10.1037/a0024516. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
8
How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios.大猩猩(黑猩猩、红毛猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩)在反向奖励 contingency 任务 II 中的表现:向新数量的转移、长期保持以及数量比率的影响。
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):204-12. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.204.
9
Apes' use of iconic cues in the object-choice task.猿类在物体选择任务中对标志性线索的运用。
Anim Cogn. 2006 Apr;9(2):118-30. doi: 10.1007/s10071-005-0013-4. Epub 2006 Jan 5.
10
Direct and indirect reputation formation in nonhuman great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus) and human children (Homo sapiens).非人类的大型猿类(倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩、红毛猩猩)和人类儿童(智人)中直接和间接声誉的形成。
J Comp Psychol. 2013 Feb;127(1):63-75. doi: 10.1037/a0028929. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The origin of great ape gestural forms.类人猿手势形式的起源。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2025 Feb;100(1):190-204. doi: 10.1111/brv.13136. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
2
When and how do non-human great apes communicate to support cooperation?何时以及如何通过非人类的大猿类进行交流来支持合作?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210109. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0109. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
3
Free-Ranging Dogs Are Capable of Utilizing Complex Human Pointing Cues.自由放养的狗能够利用复杂的人类指示线索。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 17;10:2818. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02818. eCollection 2019.
4
Chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes) coordinate by communicating in a collaborative problem-solving task.黑猩猩( Pan troglodytes)通过在协作解决问题的任务中进行交流来协调。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Apr 24;286(1901):20190408. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0408.
5
The goal of ape pointing.猿猴指向的目的。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 25;13(4):e0195182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195182. eCollection 2018.
6
Vocalizing in chimpanzees is influenced by social-cognitive processes.黑猩猩的发声受到社会认知过程的影响。
Sci Adv. 2017 Nov 15;3(11):e1701742. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701742. eCollection 2017 Nov.
7
Reading wild minds: A computational assay of Theory of Mind sophistication across seven primate species.解读野性思维:对七种灵长类动物心理理论成熟度的计算分析
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Nov 7;13(11):e1005833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005833. eCollection 2017 Nov.
8
Prelinguistic human infants and great apes show different communicative strategies in a triadic request situation.处于语言前阶段的人类婴儿和大猩猩在三元请求情境中表现出不同的交流策略。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 6;12(4):e0175227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175227. eCollection 2017.
9
Production and Comprehension of Gestures between Orang-Utans (Pongo pygmaeus) in a Referential Communication Game.在一个指称性交流游戏中,红毛猩猩(婆罗洲猩猩)之间手势的产生与理解
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 19;10(6):e0129726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129726. eCollection 2015.
10
Are dogs able to communicate with their owners about a desirable food in a referential and intentional way?狗能够以一种具有指代性和意向性的方式与主人交流它们想要的食物吗?
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 18;9(9):e108003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108003. eCollection 2014.