Suppr超能文献

美国一级创伤中心酒精筛查与简短干预实践的全国性调查。

Nationwide survey of alcohol screening and brief intervention practices at US Level I trauma centers.

作者信息

Terrell Francine, Zatzick Douglas F, Jurkovich Gregory J, Rivara Frederick P, Donovan Dennis M, Dunn Christopher W, Schermer Carol, Meredith Jay Wayne, Gentilello Larry M

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):630-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.05.021. Epub 2008 Jul 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2007, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma implemented a requirement that Level I trauma centers must have a mechanism to identify patients who are problem drinkers and the capacity to provide an intervention for patients who screen positive. Although the landmark alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) mandate is anticipated to impact trauma practice nationwide, a literature review revealed no studies that have systematically documented SBI practice pre-ACS requirement.

STUDY DESIGN

Trauma programs at all US Level I trauma centers were contacted and asked to complete a survey about pre-ACS requirement trauma center SBI practice.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-eight of 204 (73%) Level I trauma centers responded to the survey. More than 70% of responding centers routinely used laboratory tests (eg, blood alcohol concentration) to screen patients for alcohol and 39% routinely used a screening question or standardized screening instrument. Screen-positive patients received a formal alcohol consult or had an informal alcohol discussion with staff members approximately 25% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

The investigation observed marked variability across Level I centers in the percentage of patients screened and in the nature and extent of intervention delivery in screen-positive patients. In the wake of the ACS Committee on Trauma requirement, future research could systematically implement and evaluate training in the delivery of evidence-based alcohol interventions and training in development of trauma center organizational capacity for sustained delivery of SBI.

摘要

背景

2007年,美国外科医师学会(ACS)创伤委员会实施了一项要求,即一级创伤中心必须有机制识别存在饮酒问题的患者,并具备为筛查呈阳性的患者提供干预措施的能力。尽管这项具有里程碑意义的酒精筛查与简短干预(SBI)规定预计会对全国的创伤治疗实践产生影响,但文献综述显示,尚无研究系统记录在ACS提出要求之前的SBI实践情况。

研究设计

联系了美国所有一级创伤中心的创伤项目,并要求其完成一项关于ACS提出要求之前创伤中心SBI实践情况的调查。

结果

204家一级创伤中心中有148家(73%)回复了调查)。超过70%的回复中心常规使用实验室检测(如血液酒精浓度)对患者进行酒精筛查,39%的中心常规使用筛查问题或标准化筛查工具。筛查呈阳性的患者约有25%的时间会接受正式的酒精咨询或与工作人员进行非正式的酒精讨论。

结论

该调查发现,一级创伤中心在接受筛查的患者比例以及对筛查呈阳性患者的干预性质和程度方面存在显著差异。鉴于ACS创伤委员会的要求,未来的研究可以系统地实施和评估循证酒精干预措施的培训,以及创伤中心持续提供SBI的组织能力发展方面的培训。

相似文献

10
Feasibility of alcohol screening and brief intervention.酒精筛查与简短干预的可行性
J Trauma. 2005 Sep;59(3 Suppl):S119-23; discussion S124-33. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000174679.12567.7c.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Brief interventions for hospitalized trauma patients.对住院创伤患者的简短干预措施。
J Trauma. 2005 Sep;59(3 Suppl):S88-93; discussion S94-100. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000174682.13138.a3.
7
Brief motivational interventions: an introduction.简短动机干预:引言
J Trauma. 2005 Sep;59(3 Suppl):S21-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000179899.37332.8a.
9
Interventions-developing a plan for implementation.干预措施——制定实施计划。
J Trauma. 2005 Sep;59(3 Suppl):S144-5; discussion S146-66. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000176922.27065.ff.
10
Are we the problem? Overcoming obstacles to implementing intervention programs.我们是问题所在吗?克服实施干预计划的障碍。
J Trauma. 2005 Sep;59(3 Suppl):S135-6; discussion S146-66. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000174769.80839.12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验