• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种戈德曼压平眼压计之间的一致性。

Agreement between two Goldmann type applanation tonometers.

作者信息

George Ronnie, Arvind Hemamalini, Baskaran M, Ramesh S Ve, Raju Prema, Vijaya Lingam

机构信息

Glaucoma Services, Medical and Vision Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov-Dec;56(6):516-7. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.43381.

DOI:10.4103/0301-4738.43381
PMID:18974529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2612992/
Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess agreement between two commercially available applanation tonometers for the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP). Forty subjects underwent IOP measurement on two accurately calibrated Goldmann type applanation tonometers (Zeiss AT 030 (GATZ) and Inami L-5110(GATI)). The order of examination was randomized and observers were masked to the IOP recorded. The mean of two consecutive readings, from a randomly selected eye for each subject, was used for analysis. Agreement was assessed using the Altman and Bland plot. The mean (SD) IOP readings on GATZ was 15.32 (+/-6.80) mm Hg and on GATI was 13.52 (+/-5.65) mm Hg (p< 0.001, 95% CI of the difference: -2.48 to -1.11). The 95% limits of agreement on the Altman and Bland plot were:-2.47 to 6.16 mm Hg). There was significant inter-instrument variability between the two accurately calibrated Goldmann type applanation tonometers studied.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估两种市售压平眼压计在测量眼压(IOP)方面的一致性。40名受试者在两台精确校准的戈德曼型压平眼压计(蔡司AT 030(GATZ)和饭美L - 5110(GATI))上进行眼压测量。检查顺序是随机的,观察者对记录的眼压情况不知情。对每个受试者随机选择一只眼睛的连续两次读数的平均值进行分析。使用奥特曼和布兰德图评估一致性。GATZ上的眼压读数平均值(标准差)为15.32(±6.80)mmHg,GATI上为13.52(±5.65)mmHg(p<0.001,差异的95%置信区间:-2.48至-1.11)。奥特曼和布兰德图上的95%一致性界限为:-2.47至6.16 mmHg。在所研究的两台精确校准的戈德曼型压平眼压计之间存在显著的仪器间变异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ff/2612992/818eee1b70d5/IndianJOphthalmol-56-516-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ff/2612992/818eee1b70d5/IndianJOphthalmol-56-516-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59ff/2612992/818eee1b70d5/IndianJOphthalmol-56-516-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Agreement between two Goldmann type applanation tonometers.两种戈德曼压平眼压计之间的一致性。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov-Dec;56(6):516-7. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.43381.
2
Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.健康老年受试者中戈德曼压平眼压计、iCare眼压计、Icare PRO回弹式眼压计、非接触眼压计和Tonopen XL眼压计之间的一致性
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;38(2):687-696. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0518-2. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
3
A Comparative Study of Rebound Tonometry With Tonopen and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Following Vitreoretinal Surgery.玻璃体视网膜手术后使用眼压笔回弹式眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计的对比研究。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;161:22-8.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
4
Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.眼压计测量 Goldmann 压平眼压、动态轮廓眼压和眼反应分析仪眼压的精度。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Apr;117(4):730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.020. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
5
A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.一种新型眼压计——Corvis ST 眼压计:与非接触式眼压计和 Goldmann 压平眼压计的临床比较。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jan 23;54(1):659-65. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10984.
6
Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery.用于测量先天性白内障手术后眼压的Goldmann压平眼压计与眼反应分析仪的比较
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;28(5):582-589. doi: 10.1177/1120672118757429. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
7
The accuracy of continued clinical use of goldmann applanation tonometers with known calibration errors.已知校准误差的戈德曼压平眼压计持续临床使用的准确性。
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jan;116(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.07.014. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
8
Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.回弹式眼压计与三种压平式眼压计测量眼压的一致性
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Aug;142(2):332-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.035.
9
Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry.眼压回弹测量法的可重复性及临床评估
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;46(12):4578-80. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0586.
10
Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.激光原位角膜磨镶术对回弹眼压计和压平眼压计测量值的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;36(4):631-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.045.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of altitude on the differences between Goldmann tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry: An ecological meta-analysis.海拔对Goldmann眼压计与帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计测量结果差异的影响:一项生态荟萃分析。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 May 1;72(Suppl 3):S398-S403. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_907_23. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
2
Agreement and repeatability of Icare ic100 tonometer.Icare ic100 眼压计的一致性和可重复性。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct;68(10):2122-2125. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_546_19.
3
Potential effects of systematic errors in intraocular pressure measurements on screening for ocular hypertension.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Proview phosphene tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Can J Ophthalmol. 2006 Dec;41(6):722-6. doi: 10.3129/i06-065.
2
Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) - a comparison of agreement and reproducibility.动态轮廓眼压计(DCT)与Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)——一致性和可重复性比较
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul;245(7):1027-30. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0449-5. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
3
Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists.经验丰富和经验不足的眼压测量师使用Icare回弹式眼压计与Goldmann压平式眼压计的比较。
眼压测量中的系统误差对筛选高眼压症的潜在影响。
Eye (Lond). 2013 Apr;27(4):502-6. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.7. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
Eye (Lond). 2008 Apr;22(4):503-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702669. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
4
Inter-instrument agreement and influence of central corneal thickness on measurements with Goldmann, pneumotonometer and noncontact tonometer in glaucomatous eyes.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2006 Dec;54(4):261-5. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.27952.
5
Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers.使用戈德曼眼压计的误差来源。
Surv Ophthalmol. 1993 Jul-Aug;38(1):1-30. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(93)90053-a.
6
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.评估两种临床测量方法之间一致性的统计方法。
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.