Neeraja R, Anantharaj A, Praveen P, Karthik V, Vinitha M
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, R.V Dental College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008 Jan;26 Suppl 1:S14-8.
Treating a carious tooth in children with high caries experience by providing a restoration does not cure the disease. If the unfavorable oral environment that caused the cavity persists so will the disease and more restorations will be required in future. Treating the oral infection by reducing the number of cariogenic microorganisms and establishing a favorable oral environment to promote predominantly remineralization of tooth structure over time will stop the caries process. The present study was conducted: (1) To evaluate the efficacy of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine mouth rinses on plaque Streptococcus mutans when used as an adjunct to restoration. (2) To compare the anti-microbial effect of 1% povidone-iodine and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouth rinses on plaque S. mutans count.
Forty-five study participants in the age group of 6-12 years with dmft (decay component) of three or four were selected from one government school in Bangalore city. They were divided into three groups after the restorative treatment. Group-A, Group-B, and Group-C received 1% povidone-iodine mouth rinse, 0.2% chlorhexidine mouth rinse and placebo mouth rinse, respectively, twice daily for 14 days. The plaque sample was collected and S. mutans count was estimated at six phases: (1) Baseline, (2) 3 weeks after restoration, (3) First day after mouth rinse therapy, (4) 15 days after mouth rinse therapy, (5) 1 month and (6) 3 months after mouth rinse therapy
After the restoration the percentage change in S. mutans count was 28.4%. Immediately after mouth rinse therapy there was significant reduction in S. mutans count in all the three groups. After which the count started to increase gradually and after 3 months the bacterial counts in the povidone-iodine group and placebo group were almost near the postrestorative count.
Mouth rinses can be used as adjunct to restoration for short duration as temporary measure in reduction of S. mutans count and restorations provide longer effect. In case a mouth rinse has to be used, chlorhexidine can be recommended as it has shown to have better effect than Povidone-iodine and placebo.
对于患龋风险高的儿童,仅通过补牙治疗龋病并不能治愈该疾病。如果导致龋齿的不良口腔环境持续存在,那么疾病也会持续,未来还需要更多补牙治疗。通过减少致龋微生物数量并建立有利于牙齿结构长期主要进行再矿化的口腔环境来治疗口腔感染,将会阻止龋病进程。开展本研究的目的如下:(1)评估聚维酮碘和氯己定漱口水作为补牙辅助手段时对牙菌斑变形链球菌的疗效。(2)比较1%聚维酮碘漱口水和0.2%氯己定漱口水对牙菌斑变形链球菌数量的抗菌效果。
从班加罗尔市的一所政府学校选取45名年龄在6至12岁、乳牙龋失补牙面数(dmft,龋坏部分)为三或四的研究参与者。补牙治疗后,他们被分为三组。A组、B组和C组分别接受1%聚维酮碘漱口水、0.2%氯己定漱口水和安慰剂漱口水治疗,每天两次,持续14天。在六个阶段收集牙菌斑样本并估算变形链球菌数量:(1)基线期,(2)补牙后3周,(3)漱口水治疗第一天,(4)漱口水治疗15天后,(5)漱口水治疗1个月后,(6)漱口水治疗3个月后。
补牙后,变形链球菌数量的百分比变化为28.4%。漱口水治疗后,所有三组的变形链球菌数量立即显著减少。此后,数量开始逐渐增加,3个月后,聚维酮碘组和安慰剂组的细菌数量几乎接近补牙后的数量。
漱口水可作为补牙的辅助手段短期使用,作为降低变形链球菌数量的临时措施,而补牙具有更持久的效果。如果必须使用漱口水,推荐使用氯己定,因为它已显示出比聚维酮碘和安慰剂具有更好的效果。