Suppr超能文献

学习的机会和变革的障碍:温哥华市中心东区的快克可卡因使用情况。

Opportunities to learn and barriers to change: crack cocaine use in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver.

机构信息

Studies in Policy & Practice, University of Victoria, Canada.

出版信息

Harm Reduct J. 2008 Nov 17;5:34. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-5-34.

Abstract

In 2004, a team comprised of researchers and service providers launched the Safer Crack Use, Outreach, Research and Education (SCORE) project in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. The project was aimed at developing a better understanding of the harms associated with crack cocaine smoking and determining the feasibility of introducing specific harm reduction strategies. Specifically, in partnership with the community, we constructed and distributed kits that contained harm reduction materials. We were particularly interested in understanding what people thought of these kits and how the kits contents were used. To obtain this information, we conducted 27 interviews with women and men who used crack cocaine and received safer crack kits. Four broad themes were generated from the data: 1) the context of crack use practices; 2) learning/transmission of harm reduction education; 3) changing practice; 4) barriers to change. This project suggests that harm reduction education is most successful when it is informed by current practices with crack use. In addition it is most effectively delivered through informal interactions with people who use crack and includes repeated demonstrations of harm reduction equipment by peers and outreach workers. This paper also suggests that barriers to harm reduction are systemic: lack of safe housing and private space shape crack use practices.

摘要

2004 年,一个由研究人员和服务提供者组成的团队在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华的市中心东区启动了更安全的吸食可卡因、外展、研究和教育(SCORE)项目。该项目旨在更好地了解与吸食可卡因有关的危害,并确定引入特定减少危害策略的可行性。具体来说,我们与社区合作,构建并分发了包含减少危害材料的套件。我们特别关注了解人们对这些套件的看法以及套件内容的使用方式。为了获取这些信息,我们对 27 名使用可卡因并接受更安全的可卡因套件的男女进行了访谈。从数据中生成了四个广泛的主题:1)可卡因使用实践的背景;2)减少伤害教育的学习/传播;3)改变实践;4)改变的障碍。该项目表明,减少伤害教育在以下情况下最为成功:它是根据当前的可卡因使用实践来提供信息的。此外,通过与使用可卡因的人进行非正式互动,包括同伴和外展工作者对减少伤害设备的反复演示,这种教育最为有效。本文还表明,减少伤害的障碍是系统性的:缺乏安全的住房和私人空间会影响可卡因的使用方式。

相似文献

3
Education and equipment for people who smoke crack cocaine in Canada: progress and limits.
Harm Reduct J. 2017 May 12;14(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0144-3.
4
Do crack smoking practices change with the introduction of safer crack kits?
Can J Public Health. 2011 May-Jun;102(3):188-92. doi: 10.1007/BF03404893.
6
Documenting practices and perceptions of 'safer' crack use: a Canadian pilot study.
Int J Drug Policy. 2008 Aug;19(4):339-41. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
7
"We need somewhere to smoke crack": An ethnographic study of an unsanctioned safer smoking room in Vancouver, Canada.
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Jul;26(7):645-52. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
8
The process of safer crack use among women in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside.
Qual Health Res. 2013 Apr;23(4):450-62. doi: 10.1177/1049732312469465. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
10

引用本文的文献

4
Willingness to use an in-hospital supervised inhalation room among people who smoke crack cocaine in Vancouver, Canada.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Jul;37(5):645-652. doi: 10.1111/dar.12815. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
5
Declining trends in exposures to harmful policing among people who inject drugs in Vancouver, Canada.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2016 Jul 18;19(4 Suppl 3):20729. doi: 10.7448/IAS.19.4.20729. eCollection 2016.
6
Crack pipe sharing among street-involved youth in a Canadian setting.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2015 May;34(3):259-66. doi: 10.1111/dar.12180. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
9
Factors associated with difficulty accessing crack cocaine pipes in a Canadian setting.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2012 Nov;31(7):890-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00446.x. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Science and ideology.
Open Med. 2007 Aug 20;1(2):e99-e101.
2
Documenting practices and perceptions of 'safer' crack use: a Canadian pilot study.
Int J Drug Policy. 2008 Aug;19(4):339-41. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
5
Return to Galileo? The Inquisition of the International Narcotic Control Board.
Harm Reduct J. 2008 May 7;5:16. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-5-16.
6
Going soft on evidence and due process: Canada adopts US style harm maximization.
Int J Drug Policy. 2008 Jun;19(3):226-8; discussion 233-4. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.02.008.
7
Hepatitis C virus transmission among oral crack users: viral detection on crack paraphernalia.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jan;20(1):29-32. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282f16a8c.
8
Canada's 2003 renewed drug strategy--an evidence-based review.
HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev. 2006 Dec;11(2-3):1, 5-12.
9
Sharing of noninjection drug-use implements as a risk factor for hepatitis C.
Subst Use Misuse. 2004 Jan;39(2):211-24. doi: 10.1081/ja-120028488.
10
Meeting the health care needs of female crack users: a Canadian example.
Women Health. 2003;37(3):1-17. doi: 10.1300/J013v37n03_01.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验