Berger Gabriele, Frölich Lutz, Weber Bernhard, Pantel Johannes
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Heinrich-Hoffmann-Strasse 10, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2008 Dec;21(4):250-60. doi: 10.1177/0891988708324939.
We aimed to evaluate the overall diagnostic accuracy of clock drawing test methods which require a defined time setting. In addition, diagnostic relevance of time setting was analyzed qualitatively.
Clock drawing test performance of 462 consecutive memory clinic patients were analysed by 5 different clock drawing test methods. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value as well as the overall misclassification rate was calculated against a clinical diagnosis of dementia. Further, qualitative analysis of error types was done when subjects failed in the time setting task.
All clock drawing test methods that require time setting revealed higher sensitivities and superior negative predictive values as well as overall misclassification rates compared to methods which do not. Failure in the time setting task did not exclusively occur in dementia patients. However, error types which reflect a severely reduced capacity in abstract and conceptual thinking occurred exclusively in dementia patients.
Clock drawing test methods that require time setting should be favoured above methods which do not. An additional analysis of time setting errors may yield valuable diagnostic information.
我们旨在评估需要设定特定时间的画钟测试方法的总体诊断准确性。此外,还对时间设定的诊断相关性进行了定性分析。
采用5种不同的画钟测试方法,对462例连续就诊于记忆门诊的患者的画钟测试表现进行分析。根据痴呆的临床诊断计算敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及总体错误分类率。此外,当受试者在时间设定任务中失败时,对错误类型进行定性分析。
与不需要设定时间的方法相比,所有需要设定时间的画钟测试方法均显示出更高的敏感性、更好的阴性预测值以及总体错误分类率。时间设定任务失败并非仅发生在痴呆患者中。然而,反映抽象和概念思维能力严重下降的错误类型仅出现在痴呆患者中。
与不需要设定时间的方法相比,应优先选择需要设定时间的画钟测试方法。对时间设定错误进行额外分析可能会产生有价值的诊断信息。