Montero J, Bravo M, Albaladejo A
Department of Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Salamanca, Campus Unamuno, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Nov 18;6:101. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-101.
Oral health-related quality of life can be assessed positively, by measuring satisfaction with mouth, or negatively, by measuring oral impact on the performance of daily activities. The study objective was to validate two complementary indicators, i.e., the OIDP (Oral Impacts on Daily Performances) and Oral Satisfaction 0-10 Scale (OSS), in two qualitatively different socio-demographic samples of the Spanish adult population, and to analyse the factors affecting both perspectives of well-being.
A cross-sectional study was performed, recruiting a Validation Sample from randomly selected Health Centres in Granada (Spain), representing the general population (n = 253), and a Working Sample (n = 561) randomly selected from active Regional Government staff, i.e., representing the more privileged end of the socio-demographic spectrum of this reference population. All participants were examined according to WHO methodology and completed an in-person interview on their oral impacts and oral satisfaction using the OIDP and OSS 0-10 respectively. The reliability and validity of the two indicators were assessed. An alternative method of describing the causes of oral impacts is presented.
The reliability coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) of the OIDP was above the recommended 0.7 threshold in both Validation and Occupational samples (0.79 and 0.71 respectively). Test-retest analysis confirmed the external reliability of the OSS (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, 0.89; p < 0.001) Some subjective factors (perceived need for dental treatment, complaints about mouth and intermediate impacts) were strongly associated with both indicators, supporting their construct and criterion validity. The main cause of oral impact was dental pain. Several socio-demographic, behavioural and clinical variables were identified as modulating factors.
OIDP and OSS are valid and reliable subjective measures of oral impacts and oral satisfaction, respectively, in an adult Spanish population. Exploring simultaneously these issues may provide useful insights into how satisfaction and impact on well-being are constructed.
口腔健康相关生活质量可以通过测量对口腔的满意度进行正向评估,也可以通过测量口腔对日常活动表现的影响进行负向评估。本研究的目的是在西班牙成年人口两个性质不同的社会人口样本中验证两个互补指标,即口腔对日常活动的影响(OIDP)和口腔满意度0 - 10量表(OSS),并分析影响幸福感这两个方面的因素。
进行了一项横断面研究,从西班牙格拉纳达随机选择的健康中心招募了一个验证样本,代表一般人群(n = 253),以及一个工作样本(n = 561),该样本从在职的地区政府工作人员中随机选取,即代表该参考人群社会人口谱中较优越的一端。所有参与者均按照世界卫生组织的方法进行检查,并分别使用OIDP和OSS 0 - 10就其口腔影响和口腔满意度完成面对面访谈。评估了这两个指标的信度和效度。提出了一种描述口腔影响原因的替代方法。
在验证样本和职业样本中,OIDP的信度系数(克朗巴哈系数)均高于推荐的0.7阈值(分别为0.79和0.71)。重测分析证实了OSS的外部信度(组内相关系数,0.89;p < 0.001)。一些主观因素(感知到的牙科治疗需求、对口腔的抱怨和中度影响)与这两个指标都密切相关,支持了它们的结构效度和效标效度。口腔影响的主要原因是牙痛。确定了几个社会人口学、行为和临床变量为调节因素。
在成年西班牙人群中,OIDP和OSS分别是有效的、可靠的口腔影响和口腔满意度主观测量指标。同时探讨这些问题可能为满意度和对幸福感的影响是如何构建的提供有用的见解。