Rezai Mana, Côté Pierre, Cassidy J David, Carroll Linda
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Eur Spine J. 2009 Mar;18(3):371-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0823-6. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
The aim of this study was to examine the association between grades of neck pain severity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), using a population-based, cross-sectional mailed survey. The literature suggests that physical and mental HRQoL is worse for individuals with neck pain compared to those without neck pain. However, the strength of the association varies across studies. Discrepancies in study results may be attributed to the use of different definitions and measures of neck pain and differences in the selection of covariates used as control variables in the analyses. The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey was mailed to 2,184 randomly selected Saskatchewan adults of whom 1,131 returned the questionnaire. Neck pain was measured with the Chronic Pain Questionnaire and categorized into four increasing grades of severity. We measured HRQoL with the SF-36 Health Survey and computed the physical and mental component summary scores. We built separate multiple linear regression models to examine the association between grades of neck pain and physical and mental summary scores while controlling for sociodemographic, general health and comorbidity covariates. Our crude analysis suggests that a gradient exists between the severity of neck pain and HRQoL. Compared to individuals without neck pain, those with Grades III-IV neck pain have significantly lower physical (mean difference = -13.9/100; 95% CI = -16.4, -11.3) and mental (mean difference = -10.8/100; 95% CI = -13.6, -8.1) HRQoL. Controlling for covariates greatly reduced the strength of association between neck pain and physical HRQoL and accounted for the observed association between neck pain and mental HRQoL. In the comorbidity model, the strength of association between Grades III-IV neck pain and PCS decreased by more than 50% (mean difference = -4.5/100; 95% CI = -6.9, -2.0). In the final PCS model, Grades III-IV neck pain coefficients changed only slightly from the comorbidity model (mean difference = -4.4/100; 95% CI = -6.9, -1.9). This suggests that comorbid conditions account for most of the association between neck pain and PCS score. It was concluded that prevalent neck pain is weakly associated with physical HRQoL, and that it is not associated with mental HRQoL. Our cross-sectional analysis suggests that most of the observed association between prevalent neck pain and HRQoL is attributable to comorbidities.
本研究旨在通过一项基于人群的横断面邮寄调查,探讨颈部疼痛严重程度分级与健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)之间的关联。文献表明,与无颈部疼痛的个体相比,有颈部疼痛的个体的生理和心理HRQoL较差。然而,不同研究中这种关联的强度有所不同。研究结果的差异可能归因于对颈部疼痛使用了不同的定义和测量方法,以及分析中用作控制变量的协变量选择存在差异。萨斯喀彻温省健康与背痛调查被邮寄给2184名随机选择的萨斯喀彻温省成年人,其中1131人返回了问卷。使用慢性疼痛问卷测量颈部疼痛,并将其分为四个严重程度逐渐增加的等级。我们使用SF-36健康调查测量HRQoL,并计算生理和心理成分汇总得分。我们建立了单独的多元线性回归模型,以检验颈部疼痛分级与生理和心理汇总得分之间的关联,同时控制社会人口统计学、总体健康和合并症协变量。我们的粗略分析表明,颈部疼痛严重程度与HRQoL之间存在梯度关系。与无颈部疼痛的个体相比,患有III-IV级颈部疼痛的个体的生理(平均差异=-13.9/100;95%CI=-16.4,-11.3)和心理(平均差异=-10.8/100;95%CI=-13.6,-8.1)HRQoL显著更低。控制协变量大大降低了颈部疼痛与生理HRQoL之间的关联强度,并解释了颈部疼痛与心理HRQoL之间观察到的关联。在合并症模型中,III-IV级颈部疼痛与PCS之间的关联强度降低了50%以上(平均差异=-4.5/100;95%CI=-6.9,-2.0)。在最终的PCS模型中,III-IV级颈部疼痛系数与合并症模型相比变化不大(平均差异=-4.4/100;95%CI=-6.9,-1.9)。这表明合并症是颈部疼痛与PCS评分之间大部分关联的原因。研究得出结论:普遍存在的颈部疼痛与生理HRQoL弱相关,与心理HRQoL无关。我们的横断面分析表明,普遍存在的颈部疼痛与HRQoL之间观察到的大部分关联可归因于合并症。