• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

昏迷患者癫痫发作脑电图诊断的观察者间变异性

Inter-observer variability of the EEG diagnosis of seizures in comatose patients.

作者信息

Ronner H E, Ponten S C, Stam C J, Uitdehaag B M J

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology of the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Seizure. 2009 May;18(4):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2008.10.010. Epub 2008 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.seizure.2008.10.010
PMID:19046902
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the inter-observer agreement of the electroencephalogram (EEG) diagnosis of (non-convulsive) seizures in comatose patients.

DESIGN/SETTING/PATIENTS: Nine clinicians with different levels of experience in clinical neurophysiology were asked to evaluate in a strictly controlled way 90 epochs (10s each) of 30 EEG's of 23 comatose patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). For each EEG clinicians had to decide whether there was an electrographic seizure or not. Furthermore, Young's EEG criteria for (non-convulsive) seizures were scored in detail for all EEG's. Agreement was determined by calculating kappa values.

RESULTS

The inter-observer agreement of an EEG diagnosis of seizure was limited. The overall kappa score for the five experienced raters was 0.5, and the kappa score for less experienced raters was 0.29. Kappa values for the individual Young's criteria were highly variable, indicating discrepancies in the interpretation of specific phenomena. Especially, some types of periodic discharges gave rise to different interpretations.

CONCLUSIONS

The EEG diagnosis of (non-convulsive) seizures in ICU patients is not very reliable, even when strict criteria such as proposed by Young are applied. There is a need for less ambiguous EEG criteria for (non-convulsive) seizures and status epilepticus.

摘要

目的

评估昏迷患者脑电图(EEG)对(非惊厥性)癫痫发作诊断的观察者间一致性。

设计/背景/患者:邀请9名在临床神经生理学方面经验水平不同的临床医生,以严格控制的方式对23名入住重症监护病房(ICU)的昏迷患者的30份脑电图中的90个片段(每个片段10秒)进行评估。对于每份脑电图,临床医生必须判断是否存在脑电图癫痫发作。此外,还对所有脑电图详细评分了扬氏(非惊厥性)癫痫发作的脑电图标准。通过计算kappa值来确定一致性。

结果

脑电图癫痫发作诊断的观察者间一致性有限。5名经验丰富的评估者的总体kappa评分为0.5,经验较少的评估者的kappa评分为0.29。各个扬氏标准的kappa值差异很大,表明在对特定现象的解释上存在差异。特别是,某些类型的周期性放电引发了不同的解释。

结论

即使应用扬氏提出的严格标准,ICU患者(非惊厥性)癫痫发作的脑电图诊断也不是非常可靠。需要制定不那么模糊的(非惊厥性)癫痫发作和癫痫持续状态的脑电图标准。

相似文献

1
Inter-observer variability of the EEG diagnosis of seizures in comatose patients.昏迷患者癫痫发作脑电图诊断的观察者间变异性
Seizure. 2009 May;18(4):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2008.10.010. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
2
EEG in convulsive and nonconvulsive status epilepticus.惊厥性和非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的脑电图
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Sep-Oct;21(5):319-31.
3
The role of the standard 20 minute EEG recording in the comatose patient.标准的 20 分钟脑电图记录在昏迷患者中的作用。
J Clin Neurosci. 2010 Jan;17(1):64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
4
Inter-rater agreement on identification of electrographic seizures and periodic discharges in ICU EEG recordings.重症监护病房脑电图记录中电惊厥发作和周期性放电识别的评分者间一致性。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Sep;126(9):1661-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
5
Feasibility of online seizure detection with continuous EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit.在重症监护病房中使用连续脑电图监测进行在线癫痫发作检测的可行性。
Seizure. 2010 Nov;19(9):580-6. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2010.09.007.
6
Non-expert use of quantitative EEG displays for seizure identification in the adult neuro-intensive care unit.成人神经重症监护病房中癫痫发作识别的定量脑电图显示的非专业使用
Epilepsy Res. 2015 Jan;109:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
7
Interrater agreement in visual scoring of neonatal seizures based on majority voting on a web-based system: The Neoguard EEG database.基于网络系统多数投票法的新生儿惊厥视觉评分的评分者间一致性:Neoguard脑电图数据库
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1737-1745. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.250. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
8
The prevalence of seizures in comatose children in the pediatric intensive care unit: a prospective video-EEG study.儿科重症监护病房昏迷儿童癫痫发作的患病率:一项前瞻性视频-脑电图研究。
Epilepsia. 2010 Jul;51(7):1198-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02517.x. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
9
Continuous electroencephalography in the medical intensive care unit.医学重症监护病房中的持续脑电图监测
Crit Care Med. 2009 Jun;37(6):2051-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a00604.
10
Acute neonatal encephalopathy and seizures recurrence: a combined aEEG/EEG study.急性新生儿脑病和癫痫发作复发:一项联合 aEEG/EEG 研究。
Seizure. 2013 Nov;22(9):703-7. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of a discrete electrographic seizure detection algorithm for extended-duration, reduced-channel wearable EEG.用于长时间、少通道可穿戴脑电图的离散电图癫痫发作检测算法的验证
Epilepsia. 2025 Jul;66(7):2433-2443. doi: 10.1111/epi.18365. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
2
Unveiling variability: A systematic review of reproducibility in visual EEG analysis, with focus on seizures.揭示变异性:对视觉脑电图分析中可重复性的系统评价,重点关注癫痫发作。
Epileptic Disord. 2024 Dec;26(6):827-839. doi: 10.1002/epd2.20291. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
3
Interrater Reliability of Expert Electroencephalographers Identifying Seizures and Rhythmic and Periodic Patterns in EEGs.
专家脑电图医师识别脑电图中的癫痫发作和节律及周期性模式的组间可靠性。
Neurology. 2023 Apr 25;100(17):e1737-e1749. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201670. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
4
Pitfalls in EEG Analysis in Patients With Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus: A Preliminary Study.非惊厥性癫痫持续状态患者脑电图分析中的陷阱:一项初步研究。
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2023 May;54(3):255-264. doi: 10.1177/15500594211050492. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
5
The Use of Electroencephalography in Patients with Sepsis: a Review of The Literature.脑电图在脓毒症患者中的应用:文献综述
J Transl Int Med. 2021 Jan 5;9(1):12-16. doi: 10.2478/jtim-2021-0007. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Electroencephalography Technologist Inter-rater Agreement and Interpretation of Pediatric Critical Care Electroencephalography.脑电图技师的组内一致性和儿科重症监护脑电图的解读。
Pediatr Neurol. 2021 Feb;115:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.10.016. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
7
Monitoring the Burden of Seizures and Highly Epileptiform Patterns in Critical Care with a Novel Machine Learning Method.采用新型机器学习方法监测重症监护中的发作和高度癫痫样模式负担。
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Jun;34(3):908-917. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01120-0. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
8
Evaluating the Clinical Impact of Rapid Response Electroencephalography: The DECIDE Multicenter Prospective Observational Clinical Study.评估快速反应脑电图的临床影响:DECIDE 多中心前瞻性观察性临床研究。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep;48(9):1249-1257. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004428.
9
Diagnostic Value of Electroencephalography with Ten Electrodes in Critically Ill Patients.十电极脑电图对危重症患者的诊断价值。
Neurocrit Care. 2020 Oct;33(2):479-490. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00911-4.
10
Diagnostic accuracy between readers for identifying electrographic seizures in critically ill adults.危重症成年患者中,不同阅片者识别脑电图癫痫发作的诊断准确性。
Epilepsia Open. 2017 Jan 3;2(1):67-75. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12034. eCollection 2017 Mar.