Suppr超能文献

近期短效β受体激动剂的使用与随后哮喘加重之间的关系。

Relationship between recent short-acting beta-agonist use and subsequent asthma exacerbations.

作者信息

Paris Jason, Peterson Edward L, Wells Karen, Pladevall Manel, Burchard Esteban G, Choudhry Shweta, Lanfear David E, Williams L Keoki

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Nov;101(5):482-7. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60286-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

US national guidelines recommend assessing short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) medication use as a marker of asthma severity and control. However, the relationship between recent SABA use and asthma exacerbations is not currently known.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the proximal relationship between the type and frequency of SABA use and asthma-related outcomes.

METHODS

We evaluated SABA use among patients with asthma ages 5 to 56 years who were members of a large health maintenance organization in southeast Michigan. Frequency of use was estimated from pharmacy data assessing the timing and amount of SABA fills. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the prospective relationship between average daily SABA use for 3 months and outcomes associated with poor asthma control (ie, oral corticosteroids use, asthma-related emergency department visits, and asthma-related hospitalizations). We separately accounted for SABA metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and SABA nebulizer use.

RESULTS

Of the 2,056 patients who met study criteria, 1,569 (76.3%) had used a SABA medication in their baseline year. After adjusting for potential confounders, SABA nebulizer use was associated with asthma-related emergency department visits (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 6.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.38 to 16.80) and asthma-related hospitalizations (aHR, 21.62; 95% CI, 3.17 to 147.57). In contrast, frequency of SABA MDI use was not associated with these outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequency of SABA use during a 3-month period was associated with poor asthma outcomes. The relationship with poor asthma outcomes was strongest for SABA nebulizer use, suggesting that the type of SABA used is also of prognostic importance.

摘要

背景

美国国家指南建议评估短效β受体激动剂(SABA)的用药情况,以此作为哮喘严重程度和控制情况的指标。然而,目前尚不清楚近期使用SABA与哮喘急性发作之间的关系。

目的

评估SABA使用类型和频率与哮喘相关结局之间的近端关系。

方法

我们评估了密歇根州东南部一个大型健康维护组织中年龄在5至56岁的哮喘患者的SABA使用情况。使用频率通过评估SABA配药时间和数量的药房数据来估算。采用Cox比例风险模型来检验3个月平均每日使用SABA与哮喘控制不佳相关结局(即口服糖皮质激素使用、哮喘相关急诊就诊和哮喘相关住院)之间的前瞻性关系。我们分别对SABA定量吸入器(MDI)和SABA雾化器的使用情况进行了分析。

结果

在符合研究标准的2056名患者中,1569名(76.3%)在基线年份使用过SABA药物。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,使用SABA雾化器与哮喘相关急诊就诊(调整后风险比[aHR],6.32;95%置信区间[CI],2.38至16.80)和哮喘相关住院(aHR,21.62;95%CI,3.17至147.57)相关。相比之下,SABA MDI的使用频率与这些结局无关。

结论

3个月期间SABA的使用频率与哮喘不良结局相关。SABA雾化器的使用与哮喘不良结局的关系最为密切,这表明所使用的SABA类型也具有预后重要性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Progress in diagnosis and treatment of difficult-to-treat asthma in children.儿童难治性哮喘的诊治进展。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;17:17534666231213637. doi: 10.1177/17534666231213637.
4
"As-Needed" Inhaled Corticosteroids for Patients With Asthma.按需使用吸入性皮质类固醇治疗哮喘患者。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Mar;11(3):726-734. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

6
The global burden of asthma.哮喘的全球负担。
Chest. 2006 Jul;130(1 Suppl):4S-12S. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.1_suppl.4S.
9
Obtaining optimal control in mild asthma: theory and practice.实现轻度哮喘的最佳控制:理论与实践。
Fam Pract. 2005 Jun;22(3):305-10. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi013. Epub 2005 Apr 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验