Paris Jason, Peterson Edward L, Wells Karen, Pladevall Manel, Burchard Esteban G, Choudhry Shweta, Lanfear David E, Williams L Keoki
Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Nov;101(5):482-7. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60286-4.
US national guidelines recommend assessing short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) medication use as a marker of asthma severity and control. However, the relationship between recent SABA use and asthma exacerbations is not currently known.
To evaluate the proximal relationship between the type and frequency of SABA use and asthma-related outcomes.
We evaluated SABA use among patients with asthma ages 5 to 56 years who were members of a large health maintenance organization in southeast Michigan. Frequency of use was estimated from pharmacy data assessing the timing and amount of SABA fills. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the prospective relationship between average daily SABA use for 3 months and outcomes associated with poor asthma control (ie, oral corticosteroids use, asthma-related emergency department visits, and asthma-related hospitalizations). We separately accounted for SABA metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and SABA nebulizer use.
Of the 2,056 patients who met study criteria, 1,569 (76.3%) had used a SABA medication in their baseline year. After adjusting for potential confounders, SABA nebulizer use was associated with asthma-related emergency department visits (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 6.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.38 to 16.80) and asthma-related hospitalizations (aHR, 21.62; 95% CI, 3.17 to 147.57). In contrast, frequency of SABA MDI use was not associated with these outcomes.
Frequency of SABA use during a 3-month period was associated with poor asthma outcomes. The relationship with poor asthma outcomes was strongest for SABA nebulizer use, suggesting that the type of SABA used is also of prognostic importance.
美国国家指南建议评估短效β受体激动剂(SABA)的用药情况,以此作为哮喘严重程度和控制情况的指标。然而,目前尚不清楚近期使用SABA与哮喘急性发作之间的关系。
评估SABA使用类型和频率与哮喘相关结局之间的近端关系。
我们评估了密歇根州东南部一个大型健康维护组织中年龄在5至56岁的哮喘患者的SABA使用情况。使用频率通过评估SABA配药时间和数量的药房数据来估算。采用Cox比例风险模型来检验3个月平均每日使用SABA与哮喘控制不佳相关结局(即口服糖皮质激素使用、哮喘相关急诊就诊和哮喘相关住院)之间的前瞻性关系。我们分别对SABA定量吸入器(MDI)和SABA雾化器的使用情况进行了分析。
在符合研究标准的2056名患者中,1569名(76.3%)在基线年份使用过SABA药物。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,使用SABA雾化器与哮喘相关急诊就诊(调整后风险比[aHR],6.32;95%置信区间[CI],2.38至16.80)和哮喘相关住院(aHR,21.62;95%CI,3.17至147.57)相关。相比之下,SABA MDI的使用频率与这些结局无关。
3个月期间SABA的使用频率与哮喘不良结局相关。SABA雾化器的使用与哮喘不良结局的关系最为密切,这表明所使用的SABA类型也具有预后重要性。