• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情感在道德心理学中的作用。

The role of emotion in moral psychology.

作者信息

Huebner Bryce, Dwyer Susan, Hauser Marc

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Studies, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;13(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.006. Epub 2008 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.006
PMID:19058993
Abstract

Recent work in the cognitive and neurobiological sciences indicates an important relationship between emotion and moral judgment. Based on this evidence, several researchers have argued that emotions are the source of our intuitive moral judgments. However, despite the richness of the correlational data between emotion and morality, we argue that the current neurological, behavioral, developmental and evolutionary evidence is insufficient to demonstrate that emotion is necessary for making moral judgments. We suggest instead, that the source of moral judgments lies in our causal-intentional psychology; emotion often follows from these judgments, serving a primary role in motivating morally relevant action.

摘要

认知科学和神经生物学领域最近的研究表明,情绪与道德判断之间存在重要联系。基于这一证据,一些研究人员认为,情绪是我们直觉道德判断的来源。然而,尽管情绪与道德之间的相关数据丰富,但我们认为,目前的神经学、行为学、发育学和进化学证据不足以证明情绪是做出道德判断所必需的。相反,我们认为道德判断的来源在于我们的因果意向心理学;情绪往往源于这些判断,在激发与道德相关的行动中起主要作用。

相似文献

1
The role of emotion in moral psychology.情感在道德心理学中的作用。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;13(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.006. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
2
The role of emotions for moral judgments depends on the type of emotion and moral scenario.情绪对于道德判断的作用取决于情绪的类型和道德情境。
Emotion. 2012 Jun;12(3):579-90. doi: 10.1037/a0024611. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
3
The contribution of emotion and cognition to moral sensitivity: a neurodevelopmental study.情绪和认知对道德敏感性的贡献:一项神经发育研究。
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jan;22(1):209-20. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr111. Epub 2011 May 26.
4
An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment.一项关于道德判断中情感参与的功能磁共振成像研究。
Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2105-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1062872.
5
On the role of attention and emotion in morality: attentional control modulates unrelated disgust in moral judgments.论注意和情绪在道德中的作用:注意控制调节道德判断中不相关的厌恶感。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;38(9):1222-31. doi: 10.1177/0146167212448485. Epub 2012 May 29.
6
[On the necessity to distinguishing judgment from subjective choice in the cognitive neuroscience of morality].[关于道德认知神经科学中区分判断与主观选择的必要性]
Med Sci (Paris). 2011 Oct;27(10):889-94. doi: 10.1051/medsci/20112710018. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
7
Liberating reason from the passions: overriding intuitionist moral judgments through emotion reappraisal.从激情中解放理性:通过情绪再评估来克服直觉主义道德判断。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul 1;23(7):788-95. doi: 10.1177/0956797611434747. Epub 2012 May 25.
8
Emotional evidence and jurors' judgments: the promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law.情感证据与陪审员的判断:神经科学为心理学和法律提供信息的前景。
Behav Sci Law. 2009 Mar-Apr;27(2):273-96. doi: 10.1002/bsl.861.
9
Moral dilemmas and moral rules.道德困境与道德准则。
Cognition. 2006 Jul;100(3):530-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.005. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
10
Damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex is associated with impairments in both spontaneous and deliberative moral judgments.腹内侧前额皮质的损伤与自发性和深思熟虑的道德判断受损都有关联。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Mar;111:261-268. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.038. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual-System Collaborative Model of Prosocial Risky Behavior and Cognitive Computation: A Review.亲社会风险行为与认知计算的双系统协作模型:综述
Psych J. 2025 Apr;14(2):159-171. doi: 10.1002/pchj.822. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
2
The role of emotional awareness in evaluative judgment: evidence from alexithymia.情绪意识在评价判断中的作用:来自述情障碍的证据。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 30;13(1):5183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32242-y.
3
Men's reactions to gender inequality in the workplace: From relative deprivation on behalf of women to collective action.
男性对职场性别不平等的反应:从代表女性的相对剥夺感至集体行动。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 17;13:999750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999750. eCollection 2022.
4
Relationship between Moral Values for Driving Behavior and Brain Activity: An NIRS Study.驾驶行为的道德价值观与大脑活动之间的关系:一项近红外光谱研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;10(11):2221. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112221.
5
Effects of Core Disgust and Moral Disgust on Moral Judgment: An Event-Related Potential Study.核心厌恶与道德厌恶对道德判断的影响:一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 15;13:806784. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806784. eCollection 2022.
6
Effective connectivity and criminal sentencing decisions: dynamic causal models in laypersons and legal experts.有效连通性与刑事判决决策:外行人及法律专家的动态因果模型。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Sep 19;32(19):4304-4316. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab484.
7
Universality and Cultural Diversity in Moral Reasoning and Judgment.道德推理与判断中的普遍性和文化多样性
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 13;12:764360. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.764360. eCollection 2021.
8
Spacious Environments Make Us Tolerant-The Role of Emotion and Metaphor.宽敞的环境使我们更宽容——情绪和隐喻的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 7;18(19):10530. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910530.
9
Moral Judgment as Categorization (MJAC).道德判断的范畴化(MJAC)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):131-152. doi: 10.1177/1745691621990636. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
10
Policy considerations to achieve practical ethics: closing the gap between ethical theory and practic.实现实践伦理学的政策考量:弥合伦理理论与实践之间的差距
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2020 Aug 25;13:8. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v13i8.4075. eCollection 2020.