• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驾驶行为的道德价值观与大脑活动之间的关系:一项近红外光谱研究。

Relationship between Moral Values for Driving Behavior and Brain Activity: An NIRS Study.

作者信息

Kawabata Kaori, Fujita Kazuki, Sato Mamiko, Hayashi Koji, Kobayashi Yasutaka

机构信息

Graduate School of Health Science, Fukui Health Science University, Fukui 910-3190, Japan.

Fukui Higher Brain Dysfunction Support Center, Fukui 910-0067, Japan.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;10(11):2221. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112221.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare10112221
PMID:36360562
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9690200/
Abstract

Although there are clear moral components to traffic violations and risky and aggressive driving behavior, few studies have examined the relationship between moral values and risky driving. This study aimed to examine the relationship between moral views of driving behavior and brain activity. Twenty healthy drivers participated in this study. A questionnaire regarding their moral values concerning driving behavior was administered to the participants. Brain activity was measured using near-infrared spectroscopy while eliciting moral emotions. Based on the results of the questionnaire, the participants were divided into two groups: one with high moral values and the other with low moral values. Brain activity was statistically compared between the two groups. Both groups had significantly lower activity in the prefrontal cortex during the self-risky driving task. The low moral group had significantly lower activity in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex than the high moral group, while it had lower activity in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the self-risky driving task than in the safe driving task. Regardless of their moral values, the participants were less susceptible to moral emotions during risky driving. Furthermore, our findings suggest that drivers with lower moral values may be even less susceptible to moral emotions.

摘要

虽然交通违规以及危险和激进的驾驶行为中存在明确的道德成分,但很少有研究考察道德价值观与危险驾驶之间的关系。本研究旨在探讨对驾驶行为的道德看法与大脑活动之间的关系。20名健康驾驶员参与了本研究。向参与者发放了一份关于他们对驾驶行为的道德价值观的问卷。在引发道德情绪时,使用近红外光谱法测量大脑活动。根据问卷结果,将参与者分为两组:一组具有高道德价值观,另一组具有低道德价值观。对两组之间的大脑活动进行了统计学比较。在自我危险驾驶任务期间,两组的前额叶皮质活动均显著降低。低道德组在自我危险驾驶任务中,左侧背外侧前额叶皮质的活动显著低于高道德组,而右侧背外侧前额叶皮质的活动在自我危险驾驶任务中低于安全驾驶任务。无论道德价值观如何,参与者在危险驾驶期间对道德情绪的敏感度较低。此外,我们的研究结果表明,道德价值观较低的驾驶员可能对道德情绪的敏感度更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b64/9690200/86b34b0aec51/healthcare-10-02221-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b64/9690200/4464e7b90a32/healthcare-10-02221-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b64/9690200/f8b06d831625/healthcare-10-02221-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b64/9690200/86b34b0aec51/healthcare-10-02221-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b64/9690200/4464e7b90a32/healthcare-10-02221-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b64/9690200/f8b06d831625/healthcare-10-02221-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b64/9690200/86b34b0aec51/healthcare-10-02221-g003a.jpg

相似文献

1
Relationship between Moral Values for Driving Behavior and Brain Activity: An NIRS Study.驾驶行为的道德价值观与大脑活动之间的关系:一项近红外光谱研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;10(11):2221. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112221.
2
Difficulties in emotion regulation and risky driving among Lithuanian drivers.立陶宛驾驶员的情绪调节困难与危险驾驶
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Oct 3;18(7):688-693. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1315109. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
3
Assessing the relationship between self-reported driving behaviors and driver risk using a naturalistic driving study.使用自然驾驶研究评估自我报告的驾驶行为与驾驶员风险之间的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jul;128:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
4
Effects of personality on risky driving behavior and accident involvement for Chinese drivers.个性对中国驾驶员冒险驾驶行为和事故参与的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(6):565-71. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.748903.
5
Reduced dorsolateral prefrontal cortical hemodynamic response in adult obsessive-compulsive disorder as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy during the verbal fluency task.近红外光谱技术在言语流畅性任务中测量到成人强迫症患者背外侧前额叶皮质的局部脑血流反应减少。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:955-62. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S45402. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
6
Gender Differences in Prefrontal Cortex Response to Negative Emotional Stimuli in Drivers.驾驶员前额叶皮层对负面情绪刺激反应的性别差异
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 30;14(9):884. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14090884.
7
Do aggressive driving and negative emotional driving mediate the link between impulsiveness and risky driving among young Italian drivers?攻击性驾驶和负面情绪驾驶是否在意大利年轻驾驶员的冲动性与危险驾驶之间起中介作用?
J Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov-Dec;156(6):669-673. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2016.1165169. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
8
Analysis of factors influencing aggressive driver behavior and crash involvement.分析影响攻击性驾驶行为和碰撞事故发生的因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(sup1):S21-S26. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1965590. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
9
Trait anger causes risky driving behavior by influencing executive function and hazard cognition.特质愤怒通过影响执行功能和危险认知导致冒险驾驶行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Nov;177:106824. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106824. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
10
Car accidents and risky driving behaviors among young drivers from the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯东部省份年轻驾驶员的车祸和危险驾驶行为。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(8):471-477. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2113392. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Assess Brain Activation Evoked by Guilt and Shame.使用功能近红外光谱技术评估内疚和羞耻引发的大脑激活情况。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jun 10;14:197. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00197. eCollection 2020.
2
The Relationship between Norms and Risky Driving Behavior: A Systematic Review.规范与危险驾驶行为之间的关系:一项系统综述
Iran J Public Health. 2020 Feb;49(2):211-220.
3
Impulsive and Self-Regulatory Processes in Risky Driving Among Young People: A Dual Process Model.年轻人危险驾驶中的冲动与自我调节过程:一种双过程模型。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 12;10:1170. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01170. eCollection 2019.
4
Meta-analysis of the correlation between personality characteristics and risky driving behaviors.人格特征与危险驾驶行为之间相关性的荟萃分析。
J Inj Violence Res. 2019 Jul;11(2):107-122. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v11i2.1172. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
5
Differentiating guilt and shame in an interpersonal context with univariate activation and multivariate pattern analyses.在人际情境中使用单变量激活和多变量模式分析来区分内疚和羞耻。
Neuroimage. 2019 Feb 1;186:476-486. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
6
Selective changes in moral judgment by noninvasive brain stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex.通过对内侧前额叶皮质进行无创脑刺激实现道德判断的选择性改变。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Aug;19(4):797-810. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-00664-1.
7
Canonical correlation analysis of brain prefrontal activity measured by functional near infra-red spectroscopy (fNIRS) during a moral judgment task.在道德判断任务期间,通过功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)测量的大脑前额叶活动的典型相关分析。
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Feb 1;359:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.10.022. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
8
The role of prefrontal cortex in a moral judgment task using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.前额叶皮层在使用功能近红外光谱进行道德判断任务中的作用。
Brain Behav. 2018 Nov;8(11):e01116. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1116. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
9
Transport and public health in China: the road to a healthy future.中国的交通与公共卫生:通往健康未来之路。
Lancet. 2017 Oct 14;390(10104):1781-1791. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31958-X. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
10
Application of a common spatial pattern-based algorithm for an fNIRS-based motor imagery brain-computer interface.一种基于公共空间模式的算法在基于功能近红外光谱技术的运动想象脑机接口中的应用。
Neurosci Lett. 2017 Aug 10;655:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.06.044. Epub 2017 Jun 27.