Suppr超能文献

“分开同居”:关于生物伦理学、全球不平等与社会正义的思考

Living apart together: reflections on bioethics, global inequality and social justice.

作者信息

Rennie Stuart, Mupenda Bavon

机构信息

Departments of Dental Ecology, Social Medicine and Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2008 Dec 7;3:25. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-3-25.

Abstract

Significant inequalities in health between and within countries have been measured over the past decades. Although these inequalities, as well as attempts to improve sub-standard health, raise profound issues of social justice and the right to health, those working in the field of bioethics have historically tended to devote greater attention to ethical issues raised by new, cutting-edge biotechnologies such as life-support cessation, genomics, stem cell research or face transplantation. This suggests that bioethics research and scholarship may revolve around issues that, while fascinating and important, currently affect only a small minority of the world's population. In this article, we examine the accusation that bioethics is largely dominated by Anglophone and industrialized world interests, and explore what kinds of positive contributions a 'bioethics from below' (as Paul Farmer calls it) can make to the field of bioethics in general. As our guide in this exploration, we make use of some experiences and lessons learned in our collaborative bioethics project in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Building Bioethics Capacity and Justice in Health. We conclude that while there is some evidence of increased attention to bioethical challenges in developing countries, this development should be further cultivated, because it could help expand the horizons of the field and enhance its social relevance wherever it is practiced.

摘要

在过去几十年间,人们对国家之间以及国家内部存在的显著健康不平等现象进行了衡量。尽管这些不平等现象以及改善不达标的健康状况的种种努力引发了社会正义和健康权等深刻问题,但从历史上看,生物伦理学领域的工作者往往更关注由诸如停止维持生命治疗、基因组学、干细胞研究或面部移植等新兴前沿生物技术引发的伦理问题。这表明生物伦理学研究和学术探讨可能围绕着一些虽引人入胜且重要但目前仅影响世界一小部分人口的问题展开。在本文中,我们审视了生物伦理学在很大程度上受英语国家和工业化世界利益主导这一指责,并探讨“自下而上的生物伦理学”(正如保罗·法默所称)能为整个生物伦理学领域做出哪些积极贡献。作为此次探索的指引,我们借鉴了在刚果民主共和国开展的合作生物伦理学项目“建设生物伦理学能力与健康正义”中的一些经验和教训。我们得出结论,虽然有证据表明发展中国家对生物伦理挑战的关注度有所提高,但这种发展仍应进一步培育,因为它有助于拓展该领域的视野,并增强其在任何实践地区的社会相关性。

相似文献

1
Living apart together: reflections on bioethics, global inequality and social justice.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2008 Dec 7;3:25. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-3-25.
2
[Equity in health? Health inequalities, ethics, and theories of distributive justice].
Gesundheitswesen. 2010 Jan;72(1):48-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1237743. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
3
Teaching global bioethics.
Bioethics. 2003 Oct;17(5-6):432-46. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00359.
4
Linking international research to global health equity: the limited contribution of bioethics.
Bioethics. 2013 May;27(4):208-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01932.x. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
5
What is social and global justice to bioethics or bioethics to social and global justice?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2006 Jul-Aug;36(4):3. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2006.0062.
6
Applying a global justice lens to health systems research ethics: an initial exploration.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2015 Mar;25(1):35-66. doi: 10.1353/ken.2015.0005.
7
Healthcare inequality, cross-cultural training, and bioethics: principles and applications.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2008 Spring;17(2):216-26. doi: 10.1017/S0963180108080249.
8
The bioethics of medical research in very poor countries.
Health (London). 2007 Apr;11(2):145-61. doi: 10.1177/1363459307074691.
9
How to Enhance Engagement in Bioethics in the Developing World for Global Bioethics.
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Oct;17(10):32-34. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1365189.
10
Bioethics and practical justice in the post-COVID-19 era.
Dev World Bioeth. 2021 Mar;21(1):31-35. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12279. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioethicists Today: Results of the Views in Bioethics Survey.
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Sep;24(9):9-24. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2337425. Epub 2024 May 6.
2
Bioethics and COVID-19: Considering the Social Determinants of Health.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 22;9:824791. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.824791. eCollection 2022.
3
Bioethics education in Democratic Republic of Congo: Experiences and challenges.
Ethique Sante. 2018 Sep;15(3):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.etiqe.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Towards a broader understanding of agency in biomedical ethics.
Med Health Care Philos. 2016 Sep;19(3):475-83. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9706-5.
5
Good Without God: Bioethics and the Sacred.
Society. 2015;52(5):438-447. doi: 10.1007/s12115-015-9927-x.
6
The Ethics of Globalizing Bioethics.
Ethics Biol Eng Med. 2011;2(2):147-156. doi: 10.1615/EthicsBiologyEngMed.2012004265.
7
Barriers to medical device innovation.
Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Jun 13;7:205-9. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S43369. eCollection 2014.
8
Engaging with research ethics in central Francophone Africa: reflections on a workshop about ancillary care.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2012 Aug 6;7:10. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-7-10.

本文引用的文献

2
Who is buying bioethics research?
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Aug;8(8):54-8; discussion W1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160802317982.
5
CDC recommendations for opt-out testing and reactions to unanticipated HIV diagnoses.
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2008 Mar;22(3):189-93. doi: 10.1089/apc.2007.0104.
6
Time variation of some selected topics in bioethical publications.
J Med Ethics. 2008 Feb;34(2):81-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019091.
7
Public health. Implementation science.
Science. 2007 Dec 14;318(5857):1728-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1150009.
8
Global health governance and the World Bank.
Lancet. 2007 Oct 27;370(9597):1471-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61619-5.
9
Islamic ethical framework for research into and prevention of genetic diseases.
Nat Genet. 2007 Nov;39(11):1293-8. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.14. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
10
Gradations of researchers' obligation to provide ancillary care for HIV/AIDS in developing countries.
Am J Public Health. 2007 Nov;97(11):1956-61. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.093658. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验