Suppr超能文献

双心室植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的电风暴:发生率、预测因素及预后意义

Electrical storm in patients with biventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillator: incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications.

作者信息

Gasparini Maurizio, Lunati Maurizio, Landolina Maurizio, Santini Massimo, Padeletti Luigi, Perego Gianni, Vincenti Antonio, Curnis Antonio, Carboni Angelo, Denaro Alessandra, Spotti Alessia, Grammatico Andrea, Regoli François, Boriani Giuseppe

机构信息

Electrophysiology and Pacing Unit, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2008 Nov;156(5):847-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.06.035. Epub 2008 Sep 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and related outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF) treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-D) who experienced electrical storm (ES). Electrical storm was defined as the occurrence of >or=3 episodes in 24 hours of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

METHODS

A total of 631 patients with HF (90% male, mean 66+/-9 years) consecutively received a CRT-D device. At baseline, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 26%+/-7%, the QRS duration was 164+/-33 milliseconds, and the mean New York Heart Association class was 3.3+/-0.3.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 19+/-11 months, 2,419 ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes were appropriately detected in 141 (22%) patients. Electrical storm occurred in 45 (7%) of 631 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression showed that ES is more frequent in secondary prevention (hazard ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.3, P=.015) and in nonischemic patients (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.8, P=.028). In patients who presented ES, CRT was associated with only marginal nonsignificant improvements of New York Heart Association class and left ventricular ejection fraction. Hospitalizations and death due to HF were more frequent in patients with ES compared with those without ES, amounting to 16.8 (4.3) versus 8.6 (0.9) per 100 patient-years (P = .018) and 7.7 versus 2.7 per 100 patient-years (P=.014), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Electrical storm affect only 7% of CRT-D recipients and occurred more frequently in nonischemic patients with HF with biventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillators implanted for secondary prevention. Electrical storm was associated with worse HF morbidity and mortality.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估接受心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)治疗的心力衰竭(HF)患者发生电风暴(ES)的发生率、预测因素及相关结局。电风暴定义为24小时内发生≥3次持续性室性快速性心律失常发作。

方法

共有631例HF患者(90%为男性,平均年龄66±9岁)连续接受CRT-D装置植入。基线时,平均左心室射血分数为26%±7%,QRS时限为164±33毫秒,平均纽约心脏协会分级为3.3±0.3。

结果

在平均19±11个月的随访期间,141例(22%)患者共检测到2419次室性快速性心律失常发作。631例患者中有45例(7%)发生电风暴。Kaplan-Meier分析和多变量Cox回归显示,电风暴在二级预防患者(风险比2.3,95%CI 1.2-4.3,P = 0.015)和非缺血性患者(风险比2.0,95%CI 1.1-3.8,P = 0.028)中更常见。在发生电风暴的患者中,CRT仅使纽约心脏协会分级和左心室射血分数有轻微的、无统计学意义的改善。与未发生电风暴的患者相比,发生电风暴的患者因HF住院和死亡更为频繁,分别为每100患者年16.8(4.3)次和8.6(0.9)次(P = 0.018),以及每100患者年7.7次和2.7次(P = 0.014)。

结论

电风暴仅影响7%的CRT-D植入患者,在因二级预防植入双心室植入式心脏复律除颤器的非缺血性HF患者中更常见。电风暴与更差的HF发病率和死亡率相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验