Schlachta Christopher M, Sorsdahl A Kent, Lefebvre Kevin L, McCune Marcie L, Jayaraman Shiva
Canadian Surgical Technologies & Advanced Robotics, Lawson Health Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry , University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jul;23(7):1634-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0221-5. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
To demonstrate the feasibility of longitudinal mentoring and telementoring of community surgeons in laparoscopic colon surgery.
A mentoring protocol was established between a university centre and surgeons at a community hospital 60 km away. The community surgeons (CS) attended a course on laparoscopic colon surgery before observing surgery at the mentoring institution. Patients were identified from the CS practice and referred for formal consultation with the mentor. The mentor worked with the same two CS on every case in their local hospital. Procedure outcomes were recorded using Canadian Advanced Endoscopic Surgery Registry (CAESaR) practice audit software. The mentoring endpoint was 20 cases based on American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS)/Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) guidelines.
From March 2006 to August 2007, 40 patients underwent elective colon surgery by the CS, 20 of whom were referred and accepted for laparoscopic mentoring. After nine cases the MS did not scrub. Beginning with case 15, procedures were telementored except for a subtotal colectomy for which the MS assisted. Patients selected for mentoring (7 female, 13 male) compared with open cases (8 female, 12 male) were younger (60 +/- 13 years versus 72 +/- 17 years, p = 0.013), less likely to have cancer (50% versus 70%, p = 0.33)) and tended to require less complex resections. There were no conversions. Mentored cases took longer (150 +/- 43 min versus 108 +/- 40 min, p = 0.003) but resulted in shorter hospital stay (median 2.5 versus 7.0 days, p < 0.001). Median number of lymph nodes were equivalent in cancer resections (13 versus 12, p = 0.465) There were no technical difficulties with telementoring. Data will be recorded for a further 1 year to assess adoption rate and outcomes.
This project demonstrates the feasibility of longitudinal mentoring and telementoring of laparoscopic colon surgery for cancer. This program may serve as a model for safe technology transfer to the community.
证明对社区外科医生进行腹腔镜结肠手术纵向指导和远程指导的可行性。
在一所大学中心与60公里外一家社区医院的外科医生之间建立了指导方案。社区外科医生(CS)在指导机构观摩手术前参加了腹腔镜结肠手术课程。从CS的业务中确定患者,并将其转介给指导教师进行正式会诊。指导教师在当地医院与同两位CS共同处理每一个病例。使用加拿大高级内镜手术注册系统(CAESaR)实践审核软件记录手术结果。根据美国结直肠外科医师协会(ASCRS)/胃肠与内镜外科医师协会(SAGES)的指南,指导终点为20例手术。
2006年3月至2007年8月,CS对40例患者进行了择期结肠手术,其中20例被转介并接受腹腔镜指导。9例手术后,指导教师未参与手术操作。从第15例手术开始,除了1例次全结肠切除术指导教师进行了协助外,其余手术均通过远程指导进行。接受指导的患者(7例女性,13例男性)与开放手术患者(8例女性,12例男性)相比,年龄更小(60±13岁对72±17岁,p = 0.013),患癌可能性更低(50%对70%,p = 0.33),且往往需要进行不太复杂的切除术。没有出现中转开腹情况。接受指导的手术时间更长(150±43分钟对108±40分钟,p = 0.003),但住院时间更短(中位数2.5天对7.0天,p < 0.001)。癌症切除术中淋巴结的中位数数量相当(13个对12个,p = 0.465)。远程指导没有技术困难。数据将再记录1年,以评估采用率和结果。
本项目证明了对腹腔镜结肠癌手术进行纵向指导和远程指导的可行性。该项目可作为向社区安全进行技术转移的一个范例。