Cleaver S, Hunter D, Ouellette-Kuntz H
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Feb;53(2):93-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01137.x. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
Mobility limitations increase with age in the general population. Despite a growing population of older adults with intellectual disabilities (ID), mobility is rarely studied in the ID literature. The specific aim of this study was to identify and summarise primary literature investigating mobility limitations in adults with ID.
This study was a systematic review of the epidemiological literature (incidence and prevalence) of mobility limitations among adults with ID. Four electronic databases were searched from January 1980 to May 2007 for publications according to predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Additional sources were consulted. Two reviewers extracted data from each of the included articles.
Thirty-two publications representing 31 studies were ultimately included. In general, studies did not focus on mobility but were conducted for other purposes. All studies were conducted in industrialised countries. Only one study used a longitudinal design; the remainders were cross-sectional. Few investigators reported on the representativeness of the sample or the validity of the measurement tool. Study samples differed substantially and investigators used numerous definitions of mobility limiting comparability between studies.
There is a need for increased research on mobility limitations among adults with ID, particularly longitudinal research. Researchers investigating mobility limitations should use validated measurement tools and offer detailed descriptions of the study sample and how it compares with an identifiable population.
在普通人群中,行动能力受限情况随年龄增长而增加。尽管智障老年人的数量不断增加,但智障领域的文献中很少对行动能力进行研究。本研究的具体目的是识别并总结调查智障成年人行动能力受限情况的主要文献。
本研究是对智障成年人行动能力受限的流行病学文献(发病率和患病率)进行的系统综述。根据预定义的纳入/排除标准,检索了1980年1月至2007年5月期间的四个电子数据库以获取相关出版物。还查阅了其他来源。两名评审员从每篇纳入的文章中提取数据。
最终纳入了代表31项研究的32篇出版物。总体而言,研究并非聚焦于行动能力,而是为其他目的开展的。所有研究均在工业化国家进行。只有一项研究采用了纵向设计;其余均为横断面研究。很少有研究者报告样本的代表性或测量工具的有效性。研究样本差异很大,研究者对行动能力受限的定义众多,这使得各研究之间缺乏可比性。
需要增加对智障成年人行动能力受限情况的研究,尤其是纵向研究。研究行动能力受限的研究者应使用经过验证的测量工具,并详细描述研究样本及其与可识别总体的比较情况。