Suppr超能文献

门诊医疗中C反应蛋白与社区获得性肺炎:诊断准确性研究的系统评价

C-reactive protein and community-acquired pneumonia in ambulatory care: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies.

作者信息

Falk Gavin, Fahey Tom

机构信息

Department of General Practice, RCSI Medical School, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2009 Feb;26(1):10-21. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn095. Epub 2008 Dec 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is uncertainty regarding the diagnostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in community or ambulatory settings.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the diagnostic value of CRP in primary care and accident and emergency departments in terms of ruling in or ruling out CAP.

METHODS

Diagnostic accuracy systematic review, we searched PubMed from January 1966 to September 2008 and EMBASE from January 1980 to September 2008 using a diagnostic accuracy search filter. We included cross-sectional or cohort studies that assess the diagnostic utility of CRP at different cut-points against a reference standard of chest X-ray. We calculated pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) and assessed heterogeneity using the I(2) index.

RESULTS

Eight studies incorporating 2194 patients were included. The median prevalence of CAP was 14.6% (range 5%-89%). At a CRP cut-point of < or =20 mg/l, the pooled positive LR+ was 2.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-2.4] and the pooled negative LR- was 0.33 (95% CI 0.25-0.43). At the two other CRP cut-points (< or =50, >100 mg/l), the results were heterogeneous, so the pooled results should be interpreted with caution.

CONCLUSIONS

CRP may be of value in ruling out a diagnosis of CAP in situations where the probability of CAP >10%, typically accident and emergency departments. In primary care, additional diagnostic testing with CRP is unlikely to alter the probability of CAP sufficiently to change subsequent management decisions such as antibiotic prescribing or referral to hospital.

摘要

背景

在社区或门诊环境中,出现提示社区获得性肺炎(CAP)症状的患者,C反应蛋白(CRP)的诊断价值存在不确定性。

目的

我们评估了CRP在基层医疗以及急诊部门用于确诊或排除CAP方面的诊断价值。

方法

诊断准确性系统评价,我们使用诊断准确性检索过滤器,检索了1966年1月至2008年9月的PubMed以及1980年1月至2008年9月的EMBASE。我们纳入了横断面研究或队列研究,这些研究针对胸部X线这一参考标准,评估不同切点的CRP的诊断效用。我们计算了合并的阳性和阴性似然比(LRs),并使用I²指数评估异质性。

结果

纳入了八项研究,共2194例患者。CAP的中位患病率为14.6%(范围5%-89%)。在CRP切点≤20mg/L时,合并的阳性似然比LR+为2.1[95%置信区间(CI)1.8-2.4],合并的阴性似然比LR-为0.33(95%CI 0.25-0.43)。在其他两个CRP切点(≤50、>100mg/L)时,结果存在异质性,因此合并结果应谨慎解释。

结论

在CAP概率>10%的情况下,CRP可能有助于排除CAP诊断,典型情况为急诊部门。在基层医疗中,使用CRP进行额外的诊断检测不太可能充分改变CAP的概率,从而改变后续管理决策,如抗生素处方或转诊至医院。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验