Metzger Jürgen O, Hüttermann Aloys
Institute of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 26111, Oldenburg, Germany.
Naturwissenschaften. 2009 Feb;96(2):279-88. doi: 10.1007/s00114-008-0479-4. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
An important aspect of present global energy scenarios is the assumption that the amount of biomass that can be grown on the available area is so limited that a scenario based on biomass as the major source of energy should be unrealistic. We have been investigating the question whether a Biomass Scenario may be realistic. We found that the global energy demand projected by the International Energy Agency in the Reference Scenario for the year 2030 could be provided sustainably and economically primarily from lignocellulosic biomass grown on areas which have been degraded by human activities in historical times. Moreover, other renewable energies will contribute to the energy mix. There would be no competition with increasing food demand for existing arable land. Afforestation of degraded areas and investment for energy and fuel usage of the biomass are not more expensive than investment in energy infrastructure necessary up to 2030 assumed in the fossil energy based Reference Scenario, probably much cheaper considering the additional advantages such as stopping the increase of and even slowly reducing the CO(2) content of the atmosphere, soil, and water conservation and desertification control. Most importantly, investment for a Biomass Scenario would be actually sustainable, in contrast to investment in energy-supply infrastructure of the Reference Scenario. Methods of afforestation of degraded areas, cultivation, and energetic usage of lignocellulosic biomass are available but have to be further improved. Afforestation can be started immediately, has an impact in some few years, and may be realized in some decades.
当前全球能源形势的一个重要方面是,人们认为在现有土地上能够种植的生物质数量非常有限,以至于基于生物质作为主要能源的设想应该是不现实的。我们一直在研究生物质设想是否可能实现这一问题。我们发现,国际能源机构在参考设想中预测的2030年全球能源需求,主要可以由种植在历史时期因人类活动而退化的土地上的木质纤维素生物质以可持续且经济的方式提供。此外,其他可再生能源也将为能源组合做出贡献。不会与现有耕地不断增长的粮食需求产生竞争。对退化地区进行造林以及对生物质的能源和燃料利用进行投资,并不比基于化石能源的参考设想中假定的到2030年所需的能源基础设施投资更昂贵,考虑到诸如阻止大气中二氧化碳含量增加甚至缓慢降低、土壤和水资源保护以及荒漠化控制等额外优势,可能会便宜得多。最重要的是,与参考设想中的能源供应基础设施投资相比,生物质设想的投资实际上是可持续的。退化地区的造林方法、木质纤维素生物质的种植和能源利用方法已经存在,但仍需进一步改进。造林可以立即开始,几年内就会产生影响,并且可能在几十年内实现。