Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Jun;39(3):599-618. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9434-x. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
Current definitions of asexuality focus on sexual attraction, sexual behavior, and lack of sexual orientation or sexual excitation; however, the extent to which these definitions are accepted by self-identified asexuals is unknown. The goal of Study 1 was to examine relationship characteristics, frequency of sexual behaviors, sexual difficulties and distress, psychopathology, interpersonal functioning, and alexithymia in 187 asexuals recruited from the Asexuality Visibility and Education Network (AVEN). Asexual men (n = 54) and women (n = 133) completed validated questionnaires online. Sexual response was lower than normative data and was not experienced as distressing, and masturbation frequency in males was similar to available data for sexual men. Social withdrawal was the most elevated personality subscale; however, interpersonal functioning was in the normal range. Alexithymia was elevated in 12%. Social desirability was also in the normal range. Study 2 was designed to expand upon these quantitative findings with 15 asexuals from Study 1 through in-depth telephone interviews. The findings suggest that asexuality is best conceptualized as a lack of sexual attraction; however, asexuals varied greatly in their experience of sexual response and behavior. Asexuals partnered with sexuals acknowledged having to "negotiate" sexual activity. There were not higher rates of psychopathology among asexuals; however, a subset might fit the criteria for Schizoid Personality Disorder. There was also strong opposition to viewing asexuality as an extreme case of sexual desire disorder. Finally, asexuals were very motivated to liaise with sex researchers to further the scientific study of asexuality.
目前的无性恋定义侧重于性吸引、性行为以及缺乏性取向或性兴奋;然而,这些定义在多大程度上被自我认同的无性恋者所接受尚不清楚。研究 1 的目的是在 187 名从无性恋可见性和教育网络(AVEN)招募的无性恋者中,研究他们的人际关系特征、性行为频率、性困难和困扰、精神病理学、人际功能和述情障碍。无性恋男性(n=54)和女性(n=133)在线完成了验证问卷。性反应低于规范数据,且并不令人感到困扰,男性的自慰频率与性活跃男性的可用数据相似。社会退缩是最高的人格亚量表;然而,人际功能处于正常范围。12%的人存在述情障碍。社交期望也在正常范围内。研究 2 通过对研究 1 中的 15 名无性恋者进行深入的电话访谈,旨在扩展这些定量发现。研究结果表明,无性恋最好被理解为缺乏性吸引力;然而,无性恋者在性反应和行为方面存在很大差异。与性恋者配对的无性恋者承认必须“协商”性活动。无性恋者中没有更高的精神病理学发生率;然而,一部分人可能符合分裂型人格障碍的标准。也强烈反对将无性恋视为性欲望障碍的极端情况。最后,无性恋者非常有意愿与性研究人员合作,进一步科学研究无性恋。