Lord K A, Abdollahi A, Thomas S M, DeMarco M, Brugge J S, Hoffman-Liebermann B, Liebermann D A
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;11(9):4371-9. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.9.4371-4379.1991.
Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), two multifunctional cytokines lacking structural homology and binding to distinct receptors, share interesting functional similarities, which include induction of hematopoietic differentiation in normal and myeloid leukemia cells, induction of neuronal cell differentiation, and stimulation of acute-phase protein synthesis in hepatocytes. Structural information on the LIF receptor is not yet available, whereas recent cloning of the IL-6 receptor has shown it to be bipartite, with a signal-transducing subunit that lacks sequence homology to known protein kinases and produces second messengers of unknown nature. The molecular nature of the mechanisms which LIF and IL-6 use to induce cell differentiation is not known. To address this issue, we took advantage of a clone of M1 myeloblastic leukemia cells capable of being induced for terminal differentiation by both LIF and IL-6 directly activate the same set of immediate early response genes upon induction of M1 myeloid differentiation. At least two mechanisms of gene activation, one transcriptional and the other posttranscriptional, are shown to be involved. It is also shown that the LIF and IL-6 immediate early response, at suboptimal cytokine concentrations, is additive. Using a variety of protein kinase activators and inhibitors, we have shown that the intracellular signalling pathways for both LIF and IL-6 are distinct from those of known second messengers and involve protein phosphorylation, notably tyrosine phosphorylation of a 160-kDa protein, as an essential step(s) in the immediate early activation of MyD gene expression. These observations indicate that the functional similarities of LIF and IL-6 as inducers of cell differentiation prevail at the level of the complex differentiation immediate early response and implicate common mechanisms of signal transduction for LIF- and IL-6-induced differentiation.
白血病抑制因子(LIF)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)是两种缺乏结构同源性且与不同受体结合的多功能细胞因子,它们具有一些有趣的功能相似性,包括诱导正常和髓系白血病细胞的造血分化、诱导神经元细胞分化以及刺激肝细胞中急性期蛋白的合成。目前尚无关于LIF受体的结构信息,而最近克隆的IL-6受体显示它是二分体的,其信号转导亚基与已知蛋白激酶缺乏序列同源性,并产生性质未知的第二信使。LIF和IL-6用于诱导细胞分化的机制的分子本质尚不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们利用了一个M1髓母细胞白血病细胞克隆,该细胞能够被LIF和IL-6诱导进行终末分化,在诱导M1髓系分化时直接激活同一组立即早期反应基因。研究表明至少涉及两种基因激活机制,一种是转录机制,另一种是转录后机制。还表明,在次优细胞因子浓度下,LIF和IL-6的立即早期反应具有累加性。使用各种蛋白激酶激活剂和抑制剂,我们已经表明,LIF和IL-6的细胞内信号通路与已知第二信使的信号通路不同,并且涉及蛋白磷酸化,特别是一种160 kDa蛋白的酪氨酸磷酸化,这是MyD基因表达立即早期激活中的一个关键步骤。这些观察结果表明,LIF和IL-6作为细胞分化诱导剂的功能相似性在复杂的分化立即早期反应水平上占主导地位,并暗示了LIF和IL-6诱导分化的共同信号转导机制。