• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Contrast effects in response rate and accuracy of delayed matching to sample.延迟样本匹配中反应率和准确性的对比效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Sep;61(9):1400-9. doi: 10.1080/17470210701557597.
2
Drug effects on responding maintained by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer contingencies.药物对由刺激-强化物和反应-强化物偶联维持的反应的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Sep;30(2):187-96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-187.
3
Multiple schedules, off-baseline reinforcement shifts, and resistance to extinction.多种时间表、基线外强化转移以及消退抗性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 Jan;109(1):148-163. doi: 10.1002/jeab.300. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
4
Behavioral momentum and accumulation of mass in multiple schedules.多重计划中的行为动量与质量累积
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 May;103(3):437-49. doi: 10.1002/jeab.145. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
5
Effects of prefeeding, extinction, and distraction during sample and comparison presentation on sensitivity to reinforcer frequency in matching to sample.在样本呈现和比较呈现过程中进行预喂、消退和分心对样本匹配中强化频率敏感性的影响。
Behav Processes. 2009 May;81(1):65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
6
Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.并发式程序中对相对强化率的敏感性:与相对和绝对强化持续时间无关。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Jan;75(1):25-42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-25.
7
Differential outcomes enhance accuracy of delayed matching to sample but not resistance to change.差异结果提高了延迟匹配样本的准确性,但没有提高对变化的抵抗力。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Jan;35(1):74-91. doi: 10.1037/a0012926.
8
Behavioral momentum and resistance to extinction across repeated extinction tests.在多次灭绝测试中行为动力和对灭绝的抵抗力。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2019 Nov;112(3):290-309. doi: 10.1002/jeab.557. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
9
Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?替代性强化增强对改变的抵抗力:巴甫洛夫式或操作性条件作用?
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):359-79. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-359.
10
Stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and local behavioral contrast.刺激-强化的关联和局部行为对比。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Mar;29(2):297-308. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-297.

引用本文的文献

1
A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.一种关于延迟样本匹配中的注意、记忆和强化的理论。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Sep;88(2):285-317. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.88-285.

本文引用的文献

1
A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.一种关于延迟样本匹配中的注意、记忆和强化的理论。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Sep;88(2):285-317. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.88-285.
2
Delayed matching-to-sample performance: Effects of relative reinforcer frequency and of signaled versus unsignaled reinforcer magnitudes.延迟匹配样本任务表现:相对强化物频率和信号与非信号强化物大小的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Jan;63(1):33-51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-33.
3
Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.再看一下多重时间表中的对比。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Mar;39(2):345-84. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-345.
4
The analysis of behavioral momentum.行为动力分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):49-59. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-49.
5
The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.广义匹配律与信号检测理论之间的关系。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Mar;29(2):331-6. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-331.
6
Differential reinforcement and stimulus control of not responding.不反应的差别强化与刺激控制。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):715-26. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-715.
7
The optimal correction for estimating extreme discriminability.用于估计极端可辨别性的最佳校正。
Behav Res Methods. 2005 Aug;37(3):436-49. doi: 10.3758/bf03192712.
8
Remembering: the role of extraneous reinforcement.记忆:外部强化的作用。
Learn Behav. 2005 Aug;33(3):309-23. doi: 10.3758/bf03192860.
9
A theory of attending and reinforcement in conditional discriminations.条件性辨别中的注意与强化理论。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Sep;84(2):281-303. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.97-04.
10
Resistance to change of forgetting functions and response rates.遗忘功能和反应率的变化抗性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Jul;84(1):65-75. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.112-04.

延迟样本匹配中反应率和准确性的对比效应。

Contrast effects in response rate and accuracy of delayed matching to sample.

作者信息

Nevin John A, Shahan Timothy A, Odum Amy L

机构信息

University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Sep;61(9):1400-9. doi: 10.1080/17470210701557597.

DOI:10.1080/17470210701557597
PMID:19086303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2837283/
Abstract

Behavioural contrast is an inverse relation between the response rate in one component of a multiple schedule and the reinforcer rate in an alternated component. To explore possible contrast effects in accuracy as well as response rate, four pigeons were trained in multiple schedules where key pecking produced delayed matching-to-sample trials on a variable-interval schedule. Reinforcer probability for correct matches was constant at .3 in one component, and the conditions of reinforcement were varied in the second component. In Experiment 1, the varied component arranged the same contingencies as the constant component but with reinforcer probabilities of .9 or .1 across conditions. In the varied component, both response rate and accuracy of delayed matching were directly related to reinforcer probability; in the constant component, however, contrast effects on response rate were weak, and there was no evidence of contrast in accuracy of matching. In Experiment 2, the varied component was either variable interval with immediate food reinforcement or extinction. Reliable contrast effects were obtained in both response rate and in accuracy of matching in the constant component, and their magnitudes were correlated within and between subjects. The results of Experiment 2 join previous findings of covariation in the effects of reinforcement on free-operant responding and accuracy of discrimination.

摘要

行为对比是指在多重强化程序的一个成分中的反应率与交替成分中的强化率之间的反向关系。为了探究准确性以及反应率方面可能存在的对比效应,对4只鸽子进行了多重强化程序训练,在该程序中,啄键会在可变间隔程序上产生延迟的样本匹配试验。在一个成分中,正确匹配的强化概率恒定为0.3,在第二个成分中,强化条件有所变化。在实验1中,变化的成分安排了与恒定成分相同的偶然事件,但在不同条件下强化概率分别为0.9或0.1。在变化的成分中,延迟匹配的反应率和准确性都与强化概率直接相关;然而,在恒定成分中,对反应率的对比效应较弱,并且没有匹配准确性方面存在对比的证据。在实验2中,变化的成分要么是立即给予食物强化的可变间隔,要么是消退。在恒定成分中,反应率和匹配准确性方面都获得了可靠的对比效应,并且它们的大小在个体内部和个体之间都具有相关性。实验2的结果与先前关于强化对自由操作反应和辨别准确性的影响存在协变的研究结果一致。