Reis Katia Rodrigues, Bonfante Gerson, Pegoraro Luiz Fernando, Conti Paulo Cesar Rodrigues, Oliveira Pedro Cesar Garcia de, Kaizer Osvaldo Bazzan
Department of Prosthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2008 May-Jun;16(3):176-80. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572008000300003.
The wear resistance of denture teeth is important to the longevity of removable prostheses of edentulous patients. The ability of denture teeth to maintain a stable occlusal relationship over time may be influenced by this property. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the wear resistance of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture teeth based on their chemical composition when opposed by a ceramic antagonist. The maxillary canines (n=10) of 3 PMMA denture teeth (Trubyte Biotone, cross-linked PMMA; Trilux, highly cross-linked IPN (interpenetrating polymer network)-PMMA; and Vivodent, highly cross-linked PMMA) were secured in an in vitro 2-body wear-testing apparatus that produced sliding contact of the specimens (4.5 cycles/s, sliding distance of 20 mm, under 37 degrees C running water) against glazed or airborne particle abraded ceramic. Wear resistance was measured as height loss (mm) under 300 g (sliding force) after 100,000 cycles, using a digital measuring microscope. Mean values were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (a=0.05). The wear of Trubyte Biotone (0.93 +/- 0.14 mm) was significantly higher than that of both other types of teeth tested against abraded ceramic (p<0.05). The Vivodent tooth (0.64 +/- 0.17 mm) exhibited the best wear resistance among the denture teeth tested against airborne particle abraded ceramic. There were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) in wear among the 3 denture teeth evaluated against glazed ceramic. Trilux and Vivodent teeth tested against either glazed or airborne particle abraded ceramic did not differ significantly from each other (p<0.05). All teeth showed significantly more wear against airborne particle abraded ceramic than against glazed ceramic (p<0.05). In conclusion, the three types of PMMA denture teeth presented significantly different wear resistance against the abraded ceramic. The high-strength PMMA denture teeth were more wear-resistant than the conventional PMMA denture tooth.
义齿牙齿的耐磨性对于无牙患者可摘义齿的使用寿命至关重要。随着时间的推移,义齿牙齿保持稳定咬合关系的能力可能会受到这一特性的影响。本体外研究的目的是根据聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)义齿牙齿与陶瓷对颌牙相对时的化学成分来评估其耐磨性。将3种PMMA义齿牙齿(特鲁比泰生物型,交联PMMA;特里卢克斯,高度交联的互穿聚合物网络(IPN)-PMMA;以及维他灵,高度交联PMMA)的上颌尖牙(n = 10)固定在体外双体磨损测试装置中,使标本(4.5次循环/秒,滑动距离20毫米,在37摄氏度流水下)与釉质或空气颗粒磨损的陶瓷产生滑动接触。使用数字测量显微镜在100,000次循环后测量300克(滑动力)下的磨损量,以高度损失(毫米)表示。平均值通过双向方差分析和图基检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。特鲁比泰生物型牙齿的磨损量(0.93±0.14毫米)显著高于与磨损陶瓷相对测试的其他两种类型牙齿(p<0.05)。在与空气颗粒磨损陶瓷相对测试的义齿牙齿中,维他灵牙齿(0.64±0.17毫米)表现出最佳的耐磨性。在与釉质陶瓷相对评估的3种义齿牙齿中,磨损量无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。与釉质或空气颗粒磨损陶瓷相对测试的特里卢克斯和维他灵牙齿彼此之间无显著差异(p<0.05)。所有牙齿与空气颗粒磨损陶瓷相对时的磨损均显著大于与釉质陶瓷相对时的磨损(p<0.05)。总之,三种类型的PMMA义齿牙齿在与磨损陶瓷相对时表现出显著不同的耐磨性。高强度PMMA义齿牙齿比传统PMMA义齿牙齿更耐磨。