Suppr超能文献

额叶皮质亚区域在行动与刺激之间的选择中发挥着不同的作用。

Frontal cortex subregions play distinct roles in choices between actions and stimuli.

作者信息

Rudebeck Peter H, Behrens Timothy E, Kennerley Steven W, Baxter Mark G, Buckley Mark J, Walton Mark E, Rushworth Matthew F S

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 17;28(51):13775-85. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3541-08.2008.

Abstract

The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has been implicated in reinforcement-guided decision making, error monitoring, and the reversal of behavior in response to changing circumstances. The anterior cingulate cortex sulcus (ACC(S)), however, has also been implicated in similar aspects of behavior. Dissociating the unique functions of these areas would improve our understanding of the decision-making process. The effect of selective OFC lesions on how monkeys used the history of reinforcement to guide choices of either particular actions or particular stimuli was studied and compared with the effects of ACC(S) lesions. Both lesions disrupted decision making, but their effects were differentially modulated by the dependence on action- or stimulus-value contingencies. OFC lesions caused a deficit in stimulus but not action selection, whereas ACC(S) lesions had the opposite effect, disrupting action but not stimulus selection. Furthermore, OFC lesions that have previously been found to impair decision making when deterministic stimulus-reward contingencies are switched were found to cause a more general learning impairment in more naturalistic situations in which reward was stochastic. Both OFC and ACC(S) are essential for reinforcement-guided decision making rather than just error monitoring or behavioral reversal. The OFC and ACC(S) are both, however, more concerned with learning and making decisions, but their roles in selecting between stimulus and action values are distinct.

摘要

眶额皮质(OFC)与强化引导的决策、错误监测以及根据环境变化进行行为逆转有关。然而,前扣带回沟(ACC(S))也与行为的类似方面有关。区分这些区域的独特功能将增进我们对决策过程的理解。研究了选择性OFC损伤对猴子如何利用强化历史来指导特定动作或特定刺激选择的影响,并与ACC(S)损伤的影响进行了比较。两种损伤都扰乱了决策,但它们的影响因对动作或刺激价值偶然性的依赖而受到不同调节。OFC损伤导致刺激选择缺陷,但动作选择无缺陷,而ACC(S)损伤则产生相反的效果,扰乱动作选择但不影响刺激选择。此外,先前发现当确定性刺激-奖励偶然性发生切换时会损害决策的OFC损伤,在奖励随机的更自然情境中会导致更普遍的学习障碍。OFC和ACC(S)对于强化引导的决策都是必不可少的,而不仅仅是用于错误监测或行为逆转。然而,OFC和ACC(S)都更关注学习和决策,但它们在刺激和动作价值选择中的作用是不同的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Preferences reveal dissociable encoding across prefrontal-limbic circuits.偏好揭示了前额叶-边缘回路中可分离的编码。
Neuron. 2024 Jul 3;112(13):2241-2256.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.03.020. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

3
Learning the value of information in an uncertain world.在一个不确定的世界中了解信息的价值。
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Sep;10(9):1214-21. doi: 10.1038/nn1954. Epub 2007 Aug 5.
10
Separate neural pathways process different decision costs.不同的神经通路处理不同的决策成本。
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Sep;9(9):1161-8. doi: 10.1038/nn1756. Epub 2006 Aug 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验