• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠作为电休克治疗麻醉剂的比较:癫痫发作持续时间、刺激电量、临床效果及认知副作用的随机双盲比较

Comparison of propofol and thiopental as anesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized, blinded comparison of seizure duration, stimulus charge, clinical effect, and cognitive side effects.

作者信息

Bauer Jeanett, Hageman Ida, Dam Henrik, Báez Armando, Bolwig Tom, Roed Jakob, Olsen Niels Vidiendal, Jørgensen Martin Balslev

机构信息

Center of Psychiatry, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.

出版信息

J ECT. 2009 Jun;25(2):85-90. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31818a0203.

DOI:10.1097/YCT.0b013e31818a0203
PMID:19092676
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare propofol and thiopental as anesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) with respect to seizure duration, stimulus charge, clinical effect, and cognitive side effects.

METHODS

Randomized, blinded study of 62 depressed patients treated with bilateral ECT. Algorithm-based charge dosing was used.

RESULTS

The mean seizure duration of the patients in the thiopental group was 36.3 seconds versus 25.7 seconds in the propofol group (P = 0.001). The charge per treatment was 79.5 mC in the thiopental group versus 109.8 mC in the propofol group (P = 0.026). Sixteen patients in the propofol group (52%) reached the highest electrical dose versus 8 patients (26%) in the thiopental group (P = 0.014). No difference in response to treatment or number of treatments was observed. The mean score on Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was 28.9 in the thiopental group versus 26.8 in the propofol group (P = 0.014). However, age distribution of patients completing the study differed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol significantly decreases seizure duration without significant difference in the clinical outcome. Using the employed treatment algorithm, patients anesthetised with propofol received higher electrical charge. Mini-Mental State Examination scores suggest that this results in more severe cognitive side effects. Results, however, might be confounded by the differences in age distribution in the groups.

摘要

目的

比较丙泊酚和硫喷妥钠作为电休克治疗(ECT)麻醉剂时在癫痫发作持续时间、刺激电量、临床效果及认知副作用方面的差异。

方法

对62例接受双侧ECT治疗的抑郁症患者进行随机双盲研究。采用基于算法的电量给药。

结果

硫喷妥钠组患者的平均癫痫发作持续时间为36.3秒,丙泊酚组为25.7秒(P = 0.001)。硫喷妥钠组每次治疗的电量为79.5 mC,丙泊酚组为109.8 mC(P = 0.026)。丙泊酚组有16例患者(52%)达到最高电量,硫喷妥钠组为8例(26%)(P = 0.014)。在治疗反应或治疗次数上未观察到差异。硫喷妥钠组简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)的平均得分是28.9,丙泊酚组为26.8(P = 0.014)。然而,完成研究的患者年龄分布在两组间存在差异。

结论

丙泊酚显著缩短癫痫发作持续时间,但临床结果无显著差异。采用所使用的治疗算法时,丙泊酚麻醉的患者接受的电量更高。简易精神状态检查表得分表明这会导致更严重的认知副作用。然而,结果可能因两组年龄分布的差异而受到混淆。

相似文献

1
Comparison of propofol and thiopental as anesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized, blinded comparison of seizure duration, stimulus charge, clinical effect, and cognitive side effects.丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠作为电休克治疗麻醉剂的比较:癫痫发作持续时间、刺激电量、临床效果及认知副作用的随机双盲比较
J ECT. 2009 Jun;25(2):85-90. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31818a0203.
2
Propofol and methohexital as anesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized, double-blind comparison of electroconvulsive therapy seizure quality, therapeutic efficacy, and cognitive performance.丙泊酚和甲己炔巴比妥作为电休克治疗的麻醉剂:电休克治疗癫痫发作质量、治疗效果及认知表现的随机双盲比较
J ECT. 2007 Dec;23(4):239-43. doi: 10.1097/0b013e31814da971.
3
A within-subject comparison of propofol and methohexital anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy.丙泊酚和依托咪酯麻醉用于电抽搐治疗的受试者内比较。
J ECT. 2012 Mar;28(1):14-9. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31823a4220.
4
Cardiovascular effects of anesthesia in ECT: a randomized, double-blind comparison of etomidate, propofol, and thiopental.电休克治疗中麻醉的心血管效应:依托咪酯、丙泊酚和硫喷妥钠的随机双盲比较
J ECT. 2007 Mar;23(1):6-8. doi: 10.1097/01.yct.0000263251.68302.f2.
5
Effect of propofol versus sodium thiopental on electroconvulsive therapy in major depressive disorder: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial.丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠对重性抑郁障碍电抽搐治疗效果的影响:一项随机、双盲、对照临床试验。
J ECT. 2013 Mar;29(1):37-40. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e318271200b.
6
A comparison of propofol and thiopentone use in electroconvulsive therapy: cognitive and efficacy effects.丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠在电休克治疗中的应用比较:认知及疗效影响
J ECT. 2007 Sep;23(3):158-62. doi: 10.1097/yct.0b013e318070d1e9.
7
A retrospective comparison of the effects of propofol and etomidate on stimulus variables and efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in depressed inpatients.一项回顾性比较丙泊酚和依托咪酯对抑郁症住院患者电抽搐治疗刺激变量和疗效影响的研究。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Aug 1;45:230-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
8
Comparison of propofol and etomidate regarding impact on seizure threshold during electroconvulsive therapy in patients with schizophrenia.丙泊酚与依托咪酯对精神分裂症患者电休克治疗期间癫痫阈值影响的比较。
Neuropsychopharmacol Hung. 2007 Oct;9(3):125-30.
9
Effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on seizure duration, stimulus amplitudes and recovery parameters during ECT.瑞芬太尼和阿芬太尼对电休克治疗期间癫痫发作持续时间、刺激幅度及恢复参数的影响。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Sep;49(8):1068-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00766.x.
10
Comparison of Propofol, Etomidate, and Thiopental in Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.丙泊酚、依托咪酯和硫喷妥钠用于电休克治疗麻醉的比较:一项随机双盲临床试验
J ECT. 2015 Jun;31(2):91-7. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000190.

引用本文的文献

1
Propofol Versus Methohexital in Electroconvulsive Therapy: Impact on Treatment Efficacy and Adverse Effects. A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.丙泊酚与美索比妥用于电休克治疗的比较:对治疗效果和不良反应的影响。一项系统文献综述与荟萃分析
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Aug;69(7):e70083. doi: 10.1111/aas.70083.
2
Effects of N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) and Ca/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIα (CaMKIIα) on learning and memory impairment in depressed rats with different charge by modified electroconvulsive shock.N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体(NMDAR)和钙/钙调蛋白依赖性蛋白激酶IIα(CaMKIIα)对不同电量改良电休克致抑郁大鼠学习记忆障碍的影响
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Aug;9(16):1320. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-3690.
3
The effect of anaesthetic dose on response and remission in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: nationwide register-based cohort study.
麻醉剂量对重度抑郁症电休克治疗反应及缓解的影响:基于全国登记的队列研究
BJPsych Open. 2021 Mar 23;7(2):e71. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.31.
4
Changes in the Practice of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Poland: A Nationwide Survey Comparing Data Between 2005 and 2020.波兰电休克治疗实践的变化:一项比较2005年至2020年数据的全国性调查
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 Feb 22;17:605-612. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S296210. eCollection 2021.
5
Subanesthetic dose of ketamine for the antidepressant effects and the associated cognitive impairments of electroconvulsive therapy in elderly patients-A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical study.小剂量氯胺酮对老年患者电抽搐治疗的抗抑郁作用及相关认知障碍的影响:一项随机、双盲、对照的临床研究。
Brain Behav. 2021 Jan;11(1):e01775. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1775. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
6
Empirical ratio of the combined use of S-ketamine and propofol in electroconvulsive therapy and its impact on seizure quality.电抽搐治疗中 S-氯胺酮与丙泊酚联合使用的经验比值及其对抽搐质量的影响。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021 Apr;271(3):457-463. doi: 10.1007/s00406-020-01170-7. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
7
Frequency and Duration of Course of ECT Sessions: An Appraisal of Recent Evidence.电休克治疗疗程的频率和持续时间:近期证据评估
Indian J Psychol Med. 2020 Apr 25;42(3):207-218. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_410_19. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
8
Cognitive functioning in patients treated with electroconvulsive therapy.接受电休克治疗患者的认知功能
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Nov 8;14:3025-3031. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S182423. eCollection 2018.
9
Erythropoietin as an add-on treatment for cognitive side effects of electroconvulsive therapy: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.促红细胞生成素作为电休克治疗认知副作用的附加治疗:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Apr 19;19(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2627-2.
10
Thiopental is better than propofol for electroconvulsive therapy.硫喷妥钠用于电休克治疗比丙泊酚更好。
Acta Biomed. 2018 Jan 16;88(4):450-456. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i4.6094.