• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于推特的社交支持小组与仅使用Fitbit相比,在减少女性久坐行为方面的可行性、初步疗效和可及性。

Feasibility, preliminary efficacy, and accessibility of a twitter-based social support group vs Fitbit only to decrease sedentary behavior in women.

作者信息

Oppezzo M A, Tremmel J A, Kapphahn K, Desai M, Baiocchi M, Sanders M, Prochaska J J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America.

Interventional Cardiology, Women's Heart Health at Stanford, Stanford, CA, United States of America.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2021 Jul 6;25:100426. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100426. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.invent.2021.100426
PMID:34401385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8350596/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health behavior change interventions delivered by social media allow for real-time, dynamic interaction, peer social support, and experimenter-provided content.

AIMS

We tested the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a novel Twitter-based walking break intervention with daily behavior change strategies and prompts for social support, combined with a Fitbit, vs. Fitbit alone.

METHODS

In a 2-group pilot, 45 sedentary women from a heart clinic were randomized to Twitter + Fitbit activity tracker (Tweet4Wellness, n = 23) or Fitbit-only (control, n = 22). All received a Fitbit and 13 weeks of tailored weekly step goals. Tweet4Wellness consisted of a private Twitter support group, with daily automated behavior change "tweets" informed by behavior change theory, and encouragement to communicate within the group. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and enrollment numbers, implementation challenges, and number and type of help requests from participants throughout the study period. Preliminary efficacy outcomes provided by Fitbit data were sedentary minutes, number of hours with >250 steps, maximum sitting bout, weighted sedentary median bout length, total steps, intensity minutes (>3.0 METS), and ratio of time spent sitting-to-moving. Acceptability outcomes included level of Twitter participation within Tweet4Wellness, and Likert scale plus open-ended survey questions on enjoyment and perceived effectiveness of intervention components. Survey data on acceptability of the features of the intervention were collected at 13 weeks (end-of-treatment [EOT]) and 22 weeks (follow-up).

RESULTS

The study was feasible, with addressable implementation challenges. Tweet4Wellness participants changed significantly from baseline to EOT relative to control participants on number of active hours p = .018, total steps p = .028, and ratio of sitting-to-moving, p = .014. Only sitting-to-moving was significant at follow-up (p = .047). Among Tweet4Wellness participants, each tweet sent during treatment was associated with a 0.11 increase in active hours per day (p = .04) and a 292-step increase per day (p < .001). Tweet4Wellness participants averaged 54.8 (SD = 35.4) tweets, totaling 1304 tweets, and reported liking the accountability and peer support provided by the intervention.

CONCLUSION

A Twitter-delivered intervention for promoting physical activity among inactive women from a heart clinic was feasible, acceptable, and demonstrated preliminary efficacy in increasing daily active hours, daily total steps, and the ratio of sitting-to-moving from pre to post for the intervention compared with the control. Lessons learned from this pilot suggest that the next study should expand the recruitment pool, refine the intervention to increase group engagement, and select active hours, total steps, and ratio of sitting-to-movement as primary sedentary behavior measures.

摘要

背景

通过社交媒体实施的健康行为改变干预措施能够实现实时、动态互动、同伴社会支持以及由实验者提供内容。

目的

我们测试了一种基于推特的新型步行休息干预措施的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效,该干预措施结合了日常行为改变策略、社会支持提示,并与Fitbit相结合,同时与单独使用Fitbit进行对比。

方法

在一项两组试点研究中,将来自心脏病诊所的45名久坐不动的女性随机分为推特+Fitbit活动追踪器组(Tweet4Wellness,n = 23)或仅使用Fitbit组(对照组,n = 22)。所有参与者均获得一个Fitbit以及为期13周的量身定制的每周步数目标。Tweet4Wellness包括一个私人推特支持小组,根据行为改变理论每日自动发送行为改变“推文”,并鼓励小组成员进行交流。可行性结果包括招募和入组人数、实施过程中遇到的挑战,以及在整个研究期间参与者寻求帮助的数量和类型。由Fitbit数据提供的初步疗效结果包括久坐分钟数、步数超过250步的小时数、最长连续久坐时间、加权久坐中位数时长、总步数、高强度分钟数(>3.0代谢当量)以及久坐与活动时间之比。可接受性结果包括Tweet4Wellness中推特参与程度,以及关于干预组件的趣味性和感知有效性的李克特量表加开放式调查问卷问题。在第13周(治疗结束[EOT])和第22周(随访)收集关于干预特征可接受性的调查数据。

结果

该研究是可行的,实施过程中的挑战可以解决。与对照组相比,Tweet4Wellness参与者从基线到EOT在活跃小时数(p = 0.018)、总步数(p = 0.028)以及久坐与活动时间之比(p = 0.014)方面有显著变化。仅在随访时久坐与活动时间之比有显著差异(p = 0.047)。在Tweet4Wellness参与者中,治疗期间每条推文与每天活跃小时数增加0.11(p = 0.04)以及每天步数增加292步(p < 0.001)相关。Tweet4Wellness参与者平均发布54.8条(标准差 = 35.4)推文,共计1304条推文,并表示喜欢该干预措施提供的问责制和同伴支持。

结论

对于心脏病诊所中不活跃女性,通过推特实施的促进身体活动的干预措施是可行的、可接受的,并且与对照组相比,在增加每日活跃小时数、每日总步数以及干预前后久坐与活动时间之比方面显示出初步疗效。从该试点研究中吸取的经验表明,下一项研究应扩大招募范围池,优化干预措施以提高小组参与度,并选择活跃小时数、总步数以及久坐与活动之比作为主要久坐行为指标。

相似文献

1
Feasibility, preliminary efficacy, and accessibility of a twitter-based social support group vs Fitbit only to decrease sedentary behavior in women.基于推特的社交支持小组与仅使用Fitbit相比,在减少女性久坐行为方面的可行性、初步疗效和可及性。
Internet Interv. 2021 Jul 6;25:100426. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100426. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Twitter-Based Social Support Added to Fitbit Self-Monitoring for Decreasing Sedentary Behavior: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial With Female Patients From a Women's Heart Clinic.基于推特的社会支持添加到Fitbit自我监测中以减少久坐行为:一项针对女性心脏诊所女性患者的随机对照试验性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Dec 4;9(12):e20926. doi: 10.2196/20926.
3
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 17;3(3):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub3.
4
Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity.全社区范围内增加身体活动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 5;1(1):CD008366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008366.pub3.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Learning together for mental health: feasibility of measures to assess a whole-school mental health and wellbeing intervention in secondary schools.共同学习促进心理健康:评估中学全校心理健康与幸福干预措施的可行性
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 25:1-18. doi: 10.3310/GFDT2323.
7
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 20;6(6):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub4.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding for whom, under which circumstances and how sedentary behaviour interventions for older adults work: a realist review.了解针对老年人的久坐行为干预措施对谁有效、在何种情况下有效以及如何起作用:一项现实主义综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 10;15(8):e095775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095775.
2
A Work-Based, Fully Remote, and Peer-Supported Exercise Snack Behavior Change Intervention (MOV'D): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.一项基于工作场所、完全远程且由同伴支持的运动零食行为改变干预措施(MOV'D):一项随机对照试验性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 7;14:e64455. doi: 10.2196/64455.
3
Effects of using wearable devices on reducing sedentary time and prolonged sitting in healthy adults: a network meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Twitter-Based Social Support Added to Fitbit Self-Monitoring for Decreasing Sedentary Behavior: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial With Female Patients From a Women's Heart Clinic.基于推特的社会支持添加到Fitbit自我监测中以减少久坐行为:一项针对女性心脏诊所女性患者的随机对照试验性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Dec 4;9(12):e20926. doi: 10.2196/20926.
2
Key facets to build up eHealth and mHealth interventions to enhance physical activity, sedentary behavior and nutrition in healthy subjects - an umbrella review.建立电子健康和移动健康干预措施以促进健康受试者的身体活动、 sedentary behavior 和营养的关键方面 - 伞式综述。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 23;20(1):1605. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09700-7.
3
穿戴式设备对减少健康成年人久坐时间和长时间坐着的影响:网络荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 17;14(11):e080186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080186.
4
Developing cue-behavior association for habit formation: A qualitative study to explore the role of avatar in hypertension.为习惯养成建立线索-行为关联:一项探索虚拟形象在高血压中作用的定性研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 2;10:20552076241265217. doi: 10.1177/20552076241265217. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Digital Behavior Change Intervention Designs for Habit Formation: Systematic Review.用于习惯养成的数字行为改变干预设计:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 24;26:e54375. doi: 10.2196/54375.
6
Do physical activity interventions combining self-monitoring with other components provide an additional benefit compared with self-monitoring alone? A systematic review and meta-analysis.体育活动干预措施结合自我监测与其他组成部分是否比单纯自我监测更有额外益处?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2022 Dec;56(23):1366-1374. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105198. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
An intervention study to assess potential effect and user experience of an mHealth intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour among older office workers.
一项干预研究,旨在评估一款移动健康干预措施对减少老年上班族久坐行为的潜在效果及用户体验。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Nov;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100014.
4
Dose-Response Association Between Level of Physical Activity and Mortality in Normal, Elevated, and High Blood Pressure.体力活动水平与正常、升高和高血压患者死亡率之间的剂量-反应关系。
Hypertension. 2019 Dec;74(6):1307-1315. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13786. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
5
Understanding Health Behavior Technology Engagement: Pathway to Measuring Digital Behavior Change Interventions.理解健康行为技术参与度:衡量数字行为改变干预措施的途径。
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Oct 10;3(4):e14052. doi: 10.2196/14052.
6
Breaking Up Sedentary Behavior Optimally to Enhance Mood.打破久坐行为以最佳方式改善情绪。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Feb;52(2):457-465. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002132.
7
Mobile health interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in the workplace: A systematic review.促进职场身体活动及减少久坐行为的移动健康干预措施:一项系统综述
Digit Health. 2019 Mar 27;5:2055207619839883. doi: 10.1177/2055207619839883. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
8
Sedentary Behavior, Exercise, and Cardiovascular Health.久坐行为、运动与心血管健康。
Circ Res. 2019 Mar;124(5):799-815. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312669.
9
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 20;6(6):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub4.
10
Patterns of Sedentary Behavior and Mortality in U.S. Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A National Cohort Study.美国中老年人群久坐行为模式与死亡率:一项全国队列研究
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 3;167(7):465-475. doi: 10.7326/M17-0212. Epub 2017 Sep 12.