Ibrahim E M, al-Idrissi H Y, al-Khadra A H, Kurashi N Y, al-Jishi F M, Saied I, al-Mohana F A, al-Shehabi A F
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, King Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
J Cancer Educ. 1991;6(2):73-81. doi: 10.1080/08858199109528095.
We interviewed 500 adult females without personal history of any type of cancer to assess their awareness and attitude toward various aspects of breast cancer. The mean age (SD) of participants was 31.6 (+/- 8.5) years with a range of 18 to 62 years. After control for level of education, age was not found to be a statistically significant factor that influenced participants' performance. Also not statistically significant was the history of having a relative who had cancer. Conversely, education was the only examined factor that correlated with interviewees' awareness and attitude. Individuals with university or higher education (level III) were more knowledgeable (statistically significant) than uneducated or those with only primary schooling (level I), or those participants who only had intermediate or high school education (level II). On the other hand, the responses of those individuals with education level I generally performed in a fashion similar to those at education level II. The general outcome of this exercise was that unacceptably high proportions of females at all education levels were either wrong or uncertain about some fundamental aspects of breast cancer etiology, risk factors, clinical features, detection methods, and management. Also shown was the relatively high percentages of those, particularly in education level I, who held misconceptions about unconventional management or the complications of conventional methods. We conclude that academic education alone is not enough to assure that recommended health behaviors will be adopted. For establishing cancer health education or cancer prevention and early detection programs, primary care physicians and community cancer centers should work jointly. Brief guidelines are proposed.
我们采访了500名无任何癌症个人史的成年女性,以评估她们对乳腺癌各方面的认知和态度。参与者的平均年龄(标准差)为31.6(±8.5)岁,年龄范围为18至62岁。在控制教育水平后,未发现年龄是影响参与者表现的统计学显著因素。有亲属患癌症的病史也无统计学显著性。相反,教育是唯一与受访者的认知和态度相关的考察因素。拥有大学或更高学历(III级)的个体比未受过教育或只有小学学历(I级)的个体,或只有初中或高中学历(II级)的参与者更有知识(具有统计学显著性)。另一方面,I级教育水平个体的回答通常与II级教育水平个体的回答方式相似。这项调查的总体结果是,在所有教育水平中,高得令人无法接受的比例的女性对乳腺癌的病因、风险因素、临床特征、检测方法和管理等一些基本方面存在错误或不确定的认知。还显示,特别是在I级教育水平中,对非常规治疗或传统方法的并发症持有错误观念的比例相对较高。我们得出结论,仅靠学术教育不足以确保人们会采取推荐的健康行为。为建立癌症健康教育或癌症预防及早期检测项目,初级保健医生和社区癌症中心应共同努力。本文提出了简短的指导方针。