Suppr超能文献

BRYAN人工颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路减压融合术的比较:一项随机对照临床试验的临床和影像学结果

Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.

作者信息

Heller John G, Sasso Rick C, Papadopoulos Stephen M, Anderson Paul A, Fessler Richard G, Hacker Robert J, Coric Domagoj, Cauthen Joseph C, Riew Daniel K

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, The Emory Spine Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 15;34(2):101-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ee263.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, multicenter study of surgical treatment of cervical disc disease.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty using a new arthroplasty device at 24-months follow-up.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical disc arthroplasty preserves motion in the cervical spine. It is an alternative to fusion after neurologic decompression, whereas anterior decompression and fusion provides a rigorous comparative benchmark of success.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial enrolling patients with cervical disc disease. Ultimately 242 received the investigational device (Bryan Cervical Disc), and 221 patients underwent a single-level anterior cervical discectomy and decompression and fusion as a control group. Patients completed clinical and radiographic follow-up examinations at regular intervals for 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Analysis of 12- and 24-month postoperative data showed improvement in all clinical outcome measures for both groups; however, 24 months after surgery, the investigational group patients treated with the artificial disc had a statistically greater improvement in the primary outcome variables: Neck disability index score (P = 0.025) and overall success (P = 0.010). With regard to implant- or implant/surgical-procedure-associated serious adverse events, the investigational group had a rate of 1.7% and the control group, 3.2%. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups with regard to the rate of secondary surgical procedures performed subsequent to the index procedure. Patients who received the artificial cervical disc returned to work nearly 2 weeks earlier than the fusion patients (P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Two-year follow-up results indicate that cervical disc arthroplasty is a viable alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with persistently symptomatic, single-level cervical disc disease.

摘要

研究设计

一项关于颈椎间盘疾病外科治疗的前瞻性、随机、多中心研究。

目的

在24个月随访期评估使用一种新型人工椎间盘置换装置治疗颈椎间盘疾病的安全性和有效性。

背景资料总结

颈椎间盘置换可保留颈椎活动度。在神经减压术后,它是融合术的一种替代方法,而前路减压融合术则提供了一个严格的成功对比基准。

方法

我们进行了一项随机对照多中心临床试验,纳入颈椎间盘疾病患者。最终,242例患者接受了研究性装置(Bryan颈椎间盘),221例患者接受了单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除减压融合术作为对照组。患者在术后定期进行临床和影像学随访检查,为期2年。

结果

术后12个月和24个月的数据分析显示,两组的所有临床结局指标均有改善;然而,术后24个月,接受人工椎间盘治疗的研究组患者在主要结局变量方面有统计学意义上的更大改善:颈部功能障碍指数评分(P = 0.025)和总体成功率(P = 0.010)。关于与植入物或植入物/手术相关的严重不良事件,研究组发生率为1.7%,对照组为3.2%。两组在初次手术后进行二次手术的发生率方面无统计学差异。接受人工颈椎间盘的患者比融合术患者提前近2周恢复工作(P = 0.015)。

结论

两年随访结果表明,对于持续有症状的单节段颈椎间盘疾病患者,颈椎间盘置换术是颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的一种可行替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验