Suppr超能文献

加巴喷丁治疗男性潮热的III期随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(N00CB)。

A phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of gabapentin in the management of hot flashes in men (N00CB).

作者信息

Loprinzi C L, Dueck A C, Khoyratty B S, Barton D L, Jafar S, Rowland K M, Atherton P J, Marsa G W, Knutson W H, Bearden J D, Kottschade L, Fitch T R

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2009 Mar;20(3):542-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn644. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hot flashes represent a significant problem in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Via a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, men with hot flashes, on a stable androgen deprivation therapy program for prostate cancer, received a placebo or gabapentin at target doses of 300, 600, or 900 mg/day. Hot flash frequencies and severities were recorded daily during a baseline week and for 4 weeks while the patients took the study medication.

RESULTS

In the 214 eligible patients who began the study drug on this trial, comparing the fourth treatment week to the baseline week, mean hot flash scores decreased in the placebo group by 4.1 units and in the three increasing dose gabapentin groups by, 3.2, 4.6, and 7.0 units. Comparing the three combined gabapentin arms to the placebo arm did not result in significant hot flash differences. Wilcoxon rank-sum P values for change in hot flash scores and frequencies after 4 weeks of treatment were 0.10 and 0.02, comparing the highest dose gabapentin arm to the placebo arm, respectively. The gabapentin was well tolerated in this trial.

CONCLUSION

These results support that gabapentin decreases hot flashes, to a moderate degree, in men with androgen ablation-related vasomotor dysfunction.

摘要

引言

潮热是接受雄激素剥夺治疗的男性面临的一个重大问题。

材料与方法

通过一项前瞻性、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验,对患有潮热且正在接受稳定的前列腺癌雄激素剥夺治疗方案的男性,给予安慰剂或加巴喷丁,目标剂量分别为300、600或900毫克/天。在基线期的一周以及患者服用研究药物的4周期间,每天记录潮热的频率和严重程度。

结果

在本试验中开始服用研究药物的214名符合条件的患者中,将第四个治疗周与基线周进行比较,安慰剂组的平均潮热评分下降了4.1个单位,三个加巴喷丁剂量递增组分别下降了3.2、4.6和7.0个单位。将三个加巴喷丁组与安慰剂组进行比较,潮热方面未出现显著差异。治疗4周后,将最高剂量加巴喷丁组与安慰剂组相比,潮热评分和频率变化的Wilcoxon秩和P值分别为0.10和0.02。在本试验中,加巴喷丁耐受性良好。

结论

这些结果支持加巴喷丁可在一定程度上减轻与雄激素消融相关的血管舒缩功能障碍男性的潮热症状。

相似文献

7
Androgen deprivation therapy-associated vasomotor symptoms.雄激素剥夺治疗相关的血管舒缩症状。
Asian J Androl. 2012 Mar;14(2):193-7. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.101. Epub 2012 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

3
Measuring symptoms and toxicities: a 35-year experience.测量症状和毒性:35 年的经验。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jul 27;31(8):495. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07958-2.
10
Interventions to address sexual problems in people with cancer.针对癌症患者性问题的干预措施。
Curr Oncol. 2017 Jun;24(3):192-200. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3583. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

8
9
Phase III evaluation of fluoxetine for treatment of hot flashes.氟西汀治疗潮热的III期评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 15;20(6):1578-83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.6.1578.
10
Methodologic lessons learned from hot flash studies.从潮热研究中吸取的方法学经验教训。
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Dec 1;19(23):4280-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.23.4280.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验