• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessment of safety and long-term outcomes of initial treatment with placebo in TADS.TADS中初始使用安慰剂治疗的安全性及长期转归评估。
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;166(3):337-44. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040487. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
2
The Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS): long-term effectiveness and safety outcomes.青少年抑郁症治疗研究(TADS):长期疗效与安全性结果
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;64(10):1132-43. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1132.
3
A randomised controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy in adolescents with major depression treated by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The ADAPT trial.一项针对使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗的青少年重度抑郁症患者进行认知行为疗法的随机对照试验。ADAPT试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(14):iii-iv, ix-60. doi: 10.3310/hta12140.
4
Symptom clusters in adolescent depression and differential response to treatment: a secondary analysis of the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study randomised trial.青少年抑郁症的症状群及对治疗的不同反应:青少年抑郁症治疗研究随机试验的二次分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):337-343. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30060-2.
5
Fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and their combination for adolescents with depression: Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS) randomized controlled trial.氟西汀、认知行为疗法及其联合疗法用于青少年抑郁症治疗:青少年抑郁症治疗研究(TADS)随机对照试验
JAMA. 2004 Aug 18;292(7):807-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.7.807.
6
The Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS): methods and message at 12 weeks.青少年抑郁症治疗研究(TADS):12周时的方法与信息
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;45(12):1393-403. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000237709.35637.c0.
7
The addition of fluoxetine to cognitive behavioural therapy for youth depression (YoDA-C): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical trial.在青少年抑郁症认知行为疗法(YoDA-C)中添加氟西汀:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心临床试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;6(9):735-744. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30215-9. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
8
Remission and residual symptoms after short-term treatment in the Treatment of Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS).青少年抑郁症治疗研究(TADS)中短期治疗后的缓解情况及残留症状
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;45(12):1404-11. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000242228.75516.21.
9
Predictors and moderators of acute outcome in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS).青少年抑郁症治疗研究(TADS)中急性结局的预测因素和调节因素
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;45(12):1427-39. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000240838.78984.e2.
10
Functioning and quality of life in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS).青少年抑郁症治疗研究(TADS)中的功能状况与生活质量
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;45(12):1419-26. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000242229.52646.6e.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for adolescents with treatment-resistant depression: A preliminary dose-finding study exploring safety and clinical effectiveness.深度经颅磁刺激治疗青少年难治性抑郁症:一项探索安全性和临床疗效的初步剂量研究。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Jun 1;354:589-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.061. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
A comparison of the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural interventions based on delivery features for elevated symptoms of depression in adolescents: A systematic review.基于交付特征的认知行为干预对青少年抑郁症状加重的有效性比较:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 7;20(1):e1376. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1376. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Sequential bilateral accelerated theta burst stimulation in adolescents with suicidal ideation associated with major depressive disorder: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.序贯双侧加速经颅磁刺激治疗伴自杀意念的青少年重性抑郁障碍:一项随机对照试验方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0280010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280010. eCollection 2023.
4
Left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adolescents: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial.左前额叶经颅磁刺激治疗青少年难治性抑郁症:一项双盲、随机、假对照试验。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Jan;46(2):462-469. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00829-y. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Critical appraisal of adverse effects reporting in the 'Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS)'.青少年抑郁症治疗研究(TADS)中不良反应报告的批判性评价
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 15;9(3):e026089. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026089.
6
Placebo Response in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: Implications for Clinical Trial Design and Interpretation.儿童焦虑症中的安慰剂反应:对临床试验设计与解读的启示
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Oct;26(8):686-693. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0192. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
7
Trajectories of Functioning Into Emerging Adulthood Following Treatment for Adolescent Depression.青少年抑郁症治疗后至成年早期的功能轨迹。
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Mar;58(3):253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
8
Mental health service use among adolescents following participation in a randomized clinical trial for depression.青少年参与抑郁症随机临床试验后的心理健康服务使用情况
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015;44(4):551-8. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.881291. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
9
Relabeling the medications we call antidepressants.重新命名我们称之为抗抑郁药的药物。
Scientifica (Cairo). 2012;2012:965908. doi: 10.6064/2012/965908. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
10
Interventions for preventing relapse and recurrence of a depressive disorder in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症复发的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD007504. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007504.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS): long-term effectiveness and safety outcomes.青少年抑郁症治疗研究(TADS):长期疗效与安全性结果
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;64(10):1132-43. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1132.
2
Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA): classification of suicidal events in the FDA's pediatric suicidal risk analysis of antidepressants.哥伦比亚自杀评估分类算法(C-CASA):在FDA对抗抑郁药的儿科自杀风险分析中对自杀事件的分类
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;164(7):1035-43. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.7.1035.
3
A manual-based intervention to address clinical crises and retain patients in the Treatment of Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS).
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 May;46(5):573-581. doi: 10.1097/chi.0b013e3180323342.
4
Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS): safety results.青少年抑郁症治疗研究(TADS):安全性结果
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;45(12):1440-55. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000240840.63737.1d.
5
Remission and residual symptoms after short-term treatment in the Treatment of Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS).青少年抑郁症治疗研究(TADS)中短期治疗后的缓解情况及残留症状
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;45(12):1404-11. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000242228.75516.21.
6
Major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: clinical trial design and antidepressant efficacy.儿童和青少年的重度抑郁症:临床试验设计与抗抑郁药疗效
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66 Suppl 7:14-20.
7
The Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS): demographic and clinical characteristics.青少年抑郁症治疗研究(TADS):人口统计学和临床特征
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;44(1):28-40. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000145807.09027.82.
8
The ethical use of placebo in clinical trials involving children.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2004 Summer;14(2):169-74. doi: 10.1089/1044546041649057.
9
Fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and their combination for adolescents with depression: Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS) randomized controlled trial.氟西汀、认知行为疗法及其联合疗法用于青少年抑郁症治疗:青少年抑郁症治疗研究(TADS)随机对照试验
JAMA. 2004 Aug 18;292(7):807-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.7.807.
10
AACAP 2002 research forum: placebo and alternatives to placebo in randomized controlled trials in pediatric psychopharmacology.美国儿童与青少年精神医学会2002年研究论坛:儿科精神药理学随机对照试验中的安慰剂及安慰剂替代物
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;43(8):1046-56. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000129606.83206.77.

TADS中初始使用安慰剂治疗的安全性及长期转归评估。

Assessment of safety and long-term outcomes of initial treatment with placebo in TADS.

作者信息

Kennard Betsy D, Silva Susan G, Mayes Taryn L, Rohde Paul, Hughes Jennifer L, Vitiello Benedetto, Kratochvil Christopher J, Curry John F, Emslie Graham J, Reinecke Mark A, March John S

机构信息

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 75390-8589, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;166(3):337-44. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040487. Epub 2009 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040487
PMID:19147693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2823118/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors examined whether initial assignment to receive placebo for 12 weeks followed by open active treatment as clinically indicated was associated with different levels of benefit and risk of harm across 36 weeks as compared with initial assignment to receive active treatments.

METHOD

Adolescents with major depressive disorder (N=439) were randomly assigned to receive an initial 12 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), combination treatment with fluoxetine and CBT, or clinical management with placebo; those assigned to placebo received open active treatment as clinically indicated after 12 weeks of placebo. Assessments were conducted every 6 weeks for 36 weeks. The primary outcome measures were response and remission based on scores on the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised and the Clinical Global Impression improvement subscale.

RESULTS

At week 36, the response rate was 82% in the placebo/open group and 83% in the active treatment groups. The remission rate was 48% in the placebo/open group and 59% in the active treatment groups, a difference that approached statistical significance. Patients who responded to placebo generally retained their response. Those who did not respond to placebo subsequently responded to active treatment at the same rate as those initially assigned to active treatments. There were no differences between groups in rates of suicidal events, study retention, or symptom worsening.

CONCLUSIONS

Remission rates at 9 months were lower in patients treated initially with placebo, but 3 months of placebo treatment was not associated with any harm or diminished response to subsequent treatment.

摘要

目的

作者探讨了与初始分配接受活性治疗相比,最初分配接受12周安慰剂治疗随后根据临床指征进行开放活性治疗,在36周内是否具有不同程度的获益和伤害风险。

方法

患有重度抑郁症的青少年(N = 439)被随机分配接受为期12周的氟西汀治疗、认知行为疗法(CBT)、氟西汀与CBT联合治疗或安慰剂临床管理;分配到安慰剂组的患者在接受12周安慰剂治疗后,根据临床指征接受开放活性治疗。在36周内每6周进行一次评估。主要结局指标是基于儿童抑郁评定量表修订版和临床总体印象改善分量表的得分来评估反应和缓解情况。

结果

在第36周时,安慰剂/开放组的反应率为82%,活性治疗组为83%。安慰剂/开放组的缓解率为48%,活性治疗组为59%,这一差异接近统计学显著性。对安慰剂有反应的患者通常保持其反应。对安慰剂无反应的患者随后对活性治疗的反应率与最初分配接受活性治疗的患者相同。各组在自杀事件发生率、研究保留率或症状恶化方面没有差异。

结论

最初接受安慰剂治疗的患者在9个月时的缓解率较低,但3个月的安慰剂治疗与任何伤害或对后续治疗反应降低无关。