Milite Fulvia, Lederer David J, Weingarten Jeremy A, Fani Pauline, Mooney Anne M, Basner Robert C
Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009 Feb 28;165(2-3):215-20. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2008.12.009. Epub 2008 Dec 25.
The extent to which a single breath measurement represents available gas dilutional as well as compressible thoracic volume in emphysema patients has not been quantified. We therefore measured single breath (TLCSB) and rebreathe helium dilution (TLCRB), and plethysmographic lung volume (TLCpleth), in fifty-five outpatients with clinical and radiographic emphysema, and in twenty-one normal controls. Among emphysema patients, TLCSB increasingly underestimated both TLCpleth and TLCRB as FEV1% predicted decreased (p for interaction=0.001 for both) by a mean of 1.7 l for TLCRB (p<0.001) and 2.2l for TLCpleth (p<0.001). In contrast, TLCRB underestimated TLCpleth by a mean of 0.5l (p<0.001) regardless of FEV1% (p for interaction=0.25). TLCSB, TLCRB, and TLCpleth showed strong agreement among normal subjects. We conclude that TLCSB underestimates available gas dilutional and compressible lung volume as physiologic emphysema severity increases. In contrast, TLCRB and TLCpleth show closer agreement which is unaffected by physiologic emphysema severity.
单次呼吸测量在多大程度上能够代表肺气肿患者可用气体稀释以及可压缩胸腔容积尚未得到量化。因此,我们对55名临床和影像学诊断为肺气肿的门诊患者以及21名正常对照者进行了单次呼吸(TLCSB)、重复呼吸氦稀释(TLCRB)和体积描记法肺容积(TLCpleth)测量。在肺气肿患者中,随着预测FEV1%的降低,TLCSB对TLCpleth和TLCRB的低估程度均逐渐增加(两者的交互作用p值均为0.001),TLCRB平均低估1.7升(p<0.001),TLCpleth平均低估2.2升(p<0.001)。相比之下,无论FEV1%如何(交互作用p值=0.25),TLCRB对TLCpleth的低估平均为0.5升(p<0.001)。TLCSB、TLCRB和TLCpleth在正常受试者中显示出高度一致性。我们得出结论,随着生理性肺气肿严重程度的增加,TLCSB会低估可用气体稀释和可压缩肺容积。相比之下,TLCRB和TLCpleth显示出更紧密的一致性,且不受生理性肺气肿严重程度的影响。