LaBrie Joseph W, Feres Nashla, Kenney Shannon R, Lac Andrew
Loyola Marymount University, 1 LMU Drive, Suite 4700, Los Angeles, CA 90045-0041, United States.
Addict Behav. 2009 May;34(5):415-20. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.12.006. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
This study examined whether a self-reported family history of alcohol abuse (FH+) moderated the effects of a female-specific group motivational enhancement intervention with first-year college women. First-year college women (N=287) completed an initial questionnaire and attended an intervention (n=161) or control (n=126) group session, of which 118 reported FH+. Repeated measures ANCOVA models were estimated to investigate whether the effectiveness of the intervention varied as a function of one's reported family history of alcohol abuse. Results revealed that family history of alcohol abuse moderated intervention efficacy. Although the intervention was effective in producing less risky drinking relative to controls, among those participants who received the intervention, FH+ women drank less across five weeks of follow-up than FH- women. The current findings provide preliminary support for the differential effectiveness of motivational enhancement interventions with FH+ women.
本研究考察了自我报告的酒精滥用家族史(FH+)是否会调节针对大学一年级女生的特定女性群体动机增强干预的效果。大学一年级女生(N = 287)完成了初始问卷,并参加了干预组(n = 161)或对照组(n = 126)的课程,其中118人报告有FH+。估计重复测量协方差分析模型,以调查干预效果是否因报告的酒精滥用家族史而有所不同。结果显示,酒精滥用家族史调节了干预效果。尽管与对照组相比,干预在减少危险饮酒方面是有效的,但在接受干预的参与者中,FH+女性在五周的随访中饮酒量比FH-女性少。目前的研究结果为针对FH+女性的动机增强干预的差异有效性提供了初步支持。