Spear G T, Sullivan B L, Takefman D M, Landay A L, Lint T F
Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612.
Immunology. 1991 Aug;73(4):377-82.
Since animal models of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are being used increasingly in determining various aspects of virus/host interaction and as models for virus expression, it will be important to assess any significant differences in anti-viral immune responses between animals and humans. Previous studies have shown that incubation of HIV with non-immune sera from several animal species results in virus neutralization, and that rabbit serum can lyse HIV-infected cells. The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the animal complement pathway(s) activated by HIV and HIV-infected cells and determine the mechanism by which complement could mediate viral neutralization. Incubation of HIV-infected cells with mouse, guinea-pig or rabbit sera resulted in cell-surface deposition of C3 fragments. Deposition of C3 fragments did not occur either in the presence of C4-deficient guinea-pig serum or in the absence of Ca2+, indicating that activation by infected cells occurred via the classical pathway. Neutralization of free virus was also mediated by the classical pathway since C4-deficient guinea-pig serum and Ca(2+)-chelated sera lacked activity. Serum treatment of virus resulted in release of HIV reverse transcriptase (RT), suggesting that neutralization occurred by C5b-9-mediated virolysis. RT was also released from simian immunodeficiency virus by animal complement. Antibodies in animal sera were not responsible for the classical pathway activation by free virus or HIV-infected cells. These results define several substantial differences between animal and human complement reactivity with HIV which could significantly affect the ability of HIV to replicate in animals, and which need to be considered in the assessment of animal models of HIV infection.
由于人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染的动物模型在确定病毒/宿主相互作用的各个方面以及作为病毒表达模型方面的应用越来越广泛,因此评估动物和人类之间抗病毒免疫反应的任何显著差异将非常重要。先前的研究表明,HIV与几种动物物种的非免疫血清孵育会导致病毒中和,并且兔血清可以裂解HIV感染的细胞。本研究的目的是评估由HIV和HIV感染细胞激活的动物补体途径,并确定补体介导病毒中和的机制。用小鼠、豚鼠或兔血清孵育HIV感染的细胞会导致C3片段在细胞表面沉积。在缺乏C4的豚鼠血清存在下或在没有Ca2+的情况下,C3片段都不会发生沉积,这表明感染细胞的激活是通过经典途径发生的。游离病毒的中和也由经典途径介导,因为缺乏C4的豚鼠血清和Ca(2+)螯合血清缺乏活性。血清处理病毒会导致HIV逆转录酶(RT)的释放,这表明中和是由C5b-9介导的病毒溶解发生的。动物补体也从猿猴免疫缺陷病毒中释放出RT。动物血清中的抗体不是游离病毒或HIV感染细胞激活经典途径的原因。这些结果定义了动物和人类补体与HIV反应性之间的几个实质性差异,这些差异可能会显著影响HIV在动物体内复制的能力,并且在评估HIV感染的动物模型时需要考虑。