Treccani Barbara, Cubelli Roberto, Della Sala Sergio, Umilta Carlo
Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Universita di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009;62(9):1784-804. doi: 10.1080/17470210802557751.
The present study aimed at investigating the processing stage underlying stimulus-stimulus (S-S) congruency effects by examining the relation of a particular type of congruency effect (i.e., the flanker effect) with a stimulus-response (S-R) spatial correspondence effect (i.e., the Simon effect). Experiment 1 used a unilateral flanker task in which the flanker also acted as a Simon-like accessory stimulus. Results showed a significant S-S Congruency x S-R Correspondence interaction: An advantage for flanker-response spatially corresponding trials was observed in target-flanker congruent conditions, whereas, in incongruent conditions, there was a noncorresponding trials' advantage. The analysis of the temporal trend of the correspondence effects ruled out a temporal-overlap account for the observed interaction. Moreover, results of Experiment 2, in which the flanker did not belong to the target set, demonstrated that this interaction cannot be attributed to perceptual grouping of the target-flanker pairs and referential coding of the target with respect to the flanker in the congruent and incongruent conditions, respectively. Taken together, these findings are consistent with a response selection account of congruency effects: Both the position and the task-related attribute of the flanker would activate the associated responses. In noncorresponding-congruent trials and corresponding-incongruent trials, this would cause a conflict at the response selection stage.
本研究旨在通过考察一种特定类型的一致性效应(即侧翼效应)与刺激-反应(S-R)空间对应效应(即西蒙效应)之间的关系,来探究刺激-刺激(S-S)一致性效应背后的加工阶段。实验1使用了单侧侧翼任务,其中侧翼刺激也充当类似西蒙任务的辅助刺激。结果显示出显著的S-S一致性×S-R对应性交互作用:在目标-侧翼刺激一致的条件下,观察到侧翼刺激-反应在空间上对应的试验具有优势,而在不一致的条件下,非对应试验具有优势。对对应效应时间趋势的分析排除了对所观察到的交互作用的时间重叠解释。此外,在实验2中侧翼刺激不属于目标组,其结果表明这种交互作用不能归因于目标-侧翼刺激对的知觉分组,以及在一致和不一致条件下分别相对于侧翼刺激的目标参照编码。综上所述,这些发现与一致性效应的反应选择解释一致:侧翼刺激的位置和与任务相关的属性都会激活相关的反应。在非对应-一致试验和对应-不一致试验中,这会在反应选择阶段引起冲突。