Suppr超能文献

部分相干干涉测量法与超声用于眼前节生物测量的比较。

Comparison of partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound for anterior segment biometry.

作者信息

Lara Francisco, Fernández-Sánchez Vicente, López-Gil Norberto, Cerviño Alejandro, Montés-Micó Robert

机构信息

Vision Sciences Research Group, Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Envejecimiento, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Feb;35(2):324-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.038.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the performance of a partial coherence interferometry (PCI)-based device for the determination of anterior segment biometry.

SETTING

Clinica Centrofama, Cartagena, Murcia, Spain.

METHODS

Central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and lens thickness (LT) were measured with the ACMaster PCI anterior segment biometer and an Echoscan US-1800 ultrasound (US) biometer/pachymeter with and without cycloplegia. To determine the precision of the instruments, the same examiner took 30 consecutive CCT, ACD, and LT measurements in a single subject under the same conditions and with and without cycloplegia. The same measurements were performed in additional subjects.

RESULTS

Twenty-one eyes (16 subjects) were evaluated. Repeated measurements of the single subject yielded a standard deviation of 4.0 microm for CCT, 106.0 microm for ACD, and 323.0 microm for LT; there were many peaks, mainly in the last 10 readings. There was a high correlation between CCT measurements with both systems with and without cycloplegia (r(2)>0.93), with the US system giving higher values. Differences were significant (P< .001), but not consistent, throughout the range of corneal thicknesses and were greater for thicker corneas. Differences in ACD and LT measurements were similar. Agreement between systems in ACD and LT measurements was considerably lower than for CCT measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The PCI biometer provided precise CCT measurements. The ACD and LT measurements had a higher variance. Differences in CCT measurements between the 2 systems were greater for thicker corneas, with higher values with the US system.

摘要

目的

评估一种基于部分相干干涉测量法(PCI)的设备用于眼前节生物测量的性能。

设置

西班牙穆尔西亚卡塔赫纳的Clinica Centrofama。

方法

使用ACMaster PCI眼前节生物测量仪和Echoscan US - 1800超声(US)生物测量仪/角膜测厚仪,在有和没有睫状肌麻痹的情况下测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)、前房深度(ACD)和晶状体厚度(LT)。为确定仪器的精度,同一名检查者在相同条件下,对一名受试者在有和没有睫状肌麻痹的情况下连续进行30次CCT、ACD和LT测量。在其他受试者中进行相同测量。

结果

评估了21只眼(16名受试者)。对单名受试者的重复测量得出,CCT的标准差为4.0微米,ACD为106.0微米,LT为323.0微米;有许多峰值,主要在最后10次读数中。在有和没有睫状肌麻痹的情况下,两种系统测量的CCT之间存在高度相关性(r²>0.93),US系统测量值更高。差异具有显著性(P<0.001),但在整个角膜厚度范围内不一致,且对于较厚角膜差异更大。ACD和LT测量的差异相似。两种系统在ACD和LT测量方面的一致性明显低于CCT测量。

结论

PCI生物测量仪提供了精确的CCT测量。ACD和LT测量的方差更高。两种系统在CCT测量上的差异对于较厚角膜更大,US系统测量值更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验